Talk:Warrnambool railway station

Australia: Victoria / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Warrnambool railway station is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved - appears to be non-controversial, see below.-- ukexpat (talk) 20:02, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warrnambool railway station, Victoria → Warrnambool railway station — There is only one railway station in existence called "Warrnambool railway station" and as such the use of the disambiguation term "Victoria" is superfluous and potentially misleading. We make it very difficult for a reader to find this article when we use non-intuitive names and then fail to even provide redirects from the common names! Mattinbgn (talk) 01:31, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - seems non-controversial to me and I cannot find a naming convention that stipulates that railway station names must have a town/city in the title if they are not otherwise ambiguous. I will go ahead and do the move. – ukexpat (talk) 19:57, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.