Talk:Wedding Central

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disambiguation page[edit]

Shouldn't the article Wedding Central become a disambiguation page that has one article for the show on WE tv and another article for the Rainbow Media owned channel on Cablevision? --68.37.66.81 (talk) 15:28, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hijacking incident is likely a Hoax[edit]

There’s literally no sources listed for this incident. And there are no news reports on it from the time or any articles on this hijacking from this time. This is likely a YouTube hoax. 207.5.37.52 (talk) 05:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, should it be removed? I can't find anything. Really dug for a while too. The only sources for this incident are this wikipedia page, which lacks any sources, and reuploads of the supposed incident, none of which come close to the original date. Additionally, it really matches the current analog horror trend on youtube and it's aesthetic. Real or not, it's creepy as creepy gets, but I can't find any proof, and if it's a hoax it really shouldn't be mentioned here Aaaspennn (talk) 04:54, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There are no attached sources about the "TV hack", there is no credible mention about the hack online aside from referencing this exact article, and the first edit mentioning this "TV hack" is from an account who has contributed no other edits, and the attached link in that edit was already a 404 on the exact day of the edit, via archive.org. Hence, it is presumed that this supposed TV hack likely did not happen, or is not notable enough to have received media coverage, and in either case should not be added back into this article. Theknine2 (talk) 18:23, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_H7GOwVzk4 There’s a link to it, it’s not a hoax 2604:3D09:CF7C:6900:2D8E:2589:6685:3F69 (talk) 16:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the video attached is a hoax. Aaaspennn (talk) 19:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]