Talk:Westbourne, West Sussex

I'd like to add that it was named westbourne to differentiate it from eastbourne (both in sussex) but ive no idea if that is really true?

If you can find a source please edit

--195.137.34.85 23:39, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't know your identity (pity!) but I would be willing to bet that this is NOT true. At the time of "naming" Eastbourne as we know it would have hardly existed. The suffix -bourne in the South Down area means a stream that is seasonal, coming out of the lower part of the chalk hills. A settlement in ancient times would have sprung up there to take advantage of the water supply. There are plenty of examples all the way along the Downs of names ending in -bourne and in fact Eastbourne doesn't really meet the original meaning! Peter Shearan 07:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Merge proposal

Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.

Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Woodmancote, West Sussex (Chichester District) to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 07:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Removing merge proposal as both are seperate settlements and there has been zero interest in the merge (nearly 3 years been proposed). AssociateAffiliate (talk) 12:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Westbourne, West Sussex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608075926/http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf to http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)