Talk:Westbury Road Entertainment

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rihanna

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Rihanna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rihanna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RihannaWikipedia:WikiProject RihannaTemplate:WikiProject RihannaRihanna articles

Candidate for renaming or merge[edit]

This article needs to either be renamed Westbury Road Entertainment (Rihanna), or WP:Merge with Rihanna since it is her record label. Until that's done, the article should be moved to Draft Space as it currently doesn't meet the standards of WP:MOS. ^{Atsme📞📧} 17:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the article. Nothing in the article (or my searches) convinces me that the company is independently notable. It reads as a list of accomplishments of Rihanna and some others. Most of the references don't mention the company, and those that do are directory entries or mere mentions. I don't think much of anything needs to be merged. A redirect, as it was originally should be fine. Aside: The official website has copied the article. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Legacypac also had the same idea. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this was not passed by AfC. A short paragragh in Rihanna about her label is all that is needed, just like her other ventures are dealt with. Better context, better way to cover the topic. Westbury Road Entertainment (Rihanna) is not correct as there is no other company by this name. Legacypac (talk) 06:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I came to the same conclusion after I started the review, created the TP, discussed with Kudpung and went to digging to make sure I had not missed anything. Had planned to get some shut-eye and tackle it in the AM. Thank you JJMC89 and Legacypac for tackling it as quickly as you did. ^{Atsme📞📧} 06:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]