Talk:Wet Dream (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Juliette Wright[edit]

It seems there is a little confusion about which song Juliette Wright contributed lyrics. According to the LP label she contributed lyrics to "Against All Odds" while the LP sleeve notes says she contributed lyrics to "Pink's Song". The Pink Floyd Encyclopedia also states she wrotes lyrics to "Pink's Song". Does anyone know who is right about this? Floyd(Norway) 22:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The CD says everywhere that she wrote lyrics to Against the Odds. alvareo [speak to me] 23:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Title[edit]

its been suggested that the title chosen for this album - "Wet Dream" - was originally suggested by Nigel Tufnell of Spinal Tap after hearing Wright improvise a piano sequence based upon a combination of Satie and Rachmaninoff. Plutonium27 (talk) 17:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So? alvareo [speak to me] 07:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate Extended Version[edit]

The existence of this bootleg has been disputed in at least one Pink Floyd forum. It is not mentioned in any of the Wright discographies linked from this article, or from AllMusic, and online sources mentioning this recording seem to refer back to this Wikipedia article. This should probably come out unless it can be sourced. / edg 16:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stumbling upon this article today as a Floyd fan, I could not agree more with your assessment, I've never heard about the extended mix either and can't find a legitimate source to back it up. It can certainly be replaced if one comes up, but I have a premonition that it is unlikely. --WillMak050389 04:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That "extended version" is total BS. It's really absurd, I mean, songs being extended in 15 or even 25 minutes!? alvareo [speak to me] 07:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't think an extended mix can reach 25 minutes then you're clearly not familiar with either PF or the Orb.213.208.116.224 (talk) 23:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[Sorry, that was me. Thought I was logged in.]—Preceding unsigned comment added by Infojunkie23 (talkcontribs)
Beside the question. We have no verification this recording exists (when Pink Floyd recordings, including ROIO's, are usually well-catalogued), and the above-mentioned forum sources provide at least one explanation how this information could be entirely wrong. / edg 01:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Remix Length[edit]

It is nice to see the new lengths for the 2023 remix, but putting it in the length column makes it a bit difficult to read. I'm not sure what is the best solution, adding an extra_column but that puts itself before the default length or adding a new tracklisting for the 2023 edition (as was done for the David Gilmour solo album). Felix Atagong (talk) 14:29, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]