Talk:What More Can I Give/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): The Grammar and spelling are correct, and the prose is clear.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Not enough references in "Recording"

There are no more sources available. Everything in that section is sourced. Pyrrhus16 01:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


b (citations to reliable sources):

  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): it addresses the main aspects of the topic b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Review: this article is being reviewed (additional comments are welcome).
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Add link to Spanish language and italicize it
  • Done.
  • Change link form "anti-[[South Africa under apartheid|apartheid]]" to "[[South Africa under apartheid|anti-apartheid]]"
  • Done.
  • In "Background and writing," put quote box in for quote at the bottom of the section<blockquote class="toccolours" style="text-align:left; width:30%; float:left; margin:0 20px 10px 0; display:table;">'''insert text here'''</blockquote>
  • The quote is already a blockquote. The above formatting moves the quote to the left side, making the last sentence in the paragraph useless.
  • Do same thing as listed above to "Airplay's" quote.
  • This is in a quotebox and the blockquote formatting doesn't allow for quote attribution to the person that has made the remark.
  • On the "Artists Involved" table, take off question marks
  • Done.
  • Resolution of cover art images should be lowered if possible, they're a bit big.

Reviewer: CrowzRSA 22:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments thus far. :) Pyrrhus16 00:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available here, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.

Congratulations, CrowzRSA 21:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:What_More_Can_I_Give/GA1&oldid=1137316697"