This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NottinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject NottinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject NottinghamshireNottinghamshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Trams, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.UK TramsWikipedia:WikiProject UK TramsTemplate:WikiProject UK TramsUK Trams articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
I don't think there has ever been a consensus sought on the general question of whether tram stops (or more strictly, light rail stations, which is what NET stops are) are more like railway stations (for which there is an inclusion consensus) or bus stops (for which there isn't). However by precedent they are considered notable for the purpose of article creation, and that precedent is derived from a number of local consensi for inclusion (and a rather smaller number against). See, for example, Tram stops in the United Kingdom, which indirectly contains articles for every tram stop on the Croydon Tramlink, Manchester Metrolink, Midland Metro, and Nottingham Express Transit, together with some of the stops on the Sheffield and Edinburgh systems. Or if you would prefer a more global set of precedents, MAX Light Rail stations, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority light rail stations or MetroLink (St. Louis) stations. There are many others.
Now turning to this article in isolation, I would contend that Geoffery Skelsey's book meets the requirement for significant coverage in secondary sources. I'd obviously be happier if I could find a second secondary source with more than a passing reference, but I don't read WP:N as requiring multiple such sources.
I have therefore removed the {{proposed deletion}} tag from this article, as it is clear that its deletion would not be uncontroversial. If you still feel that things like Wilford Lane tram stop are not notable, I would suggest that you raise the subject for discussion at a more general level. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 14:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
