This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the William G. Farrow article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during the Doolittle Raid, the B-25 piloted by William G. Farrow, named Bat out of Hell, was the last aircraft to depart from the USS Hornet?
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:06, May 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Is there a sound basis for adopting the highly melodramatic depiction of the three being tied to crosses for execution? Other sources, e.g. findagrave.com (http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=9529372), describe a much more probable scene "executed in Shanghai’s Public Cemetery No. 1, in accordance with Japanese military tradition: they were forced to their knees, blindfolded with their arms tied behind them, then shot simultaneously by three soldiers armed with rifles in the center of their foreheads." Sirlanz 14:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Apparently, findagrave.com is not a reliable source. I believed it was, but then sometime later I discovered that it could be freely edited just like Wikipedia. Since the only requirement for including a statement in an article is the presence of a reliable source to support it, the statement that the three were tied to crosses could legitimately be included in this article. The statement is supported by the following source: http://www.scnow.com/news/local/article_5271a8d1-7d34-5677-aa52-1a4f54bdc05d.html.
You might want to take on board the following: (1) the statement is highly melodramatic, has a strong Christian racist undercurrent and very improbable; (2) who are the putative eye-witnesses propounded by the claim?; (3) the late Dwight Dana (by snow's own account "heavily involved at St. Matthews Episcopal") of Snow.com provided no source information; (4) the same account cannot be found on any other web source; (5) snow.com is a very small local regional publication serving a region of South Carolina, with low readership (217 thousandth global ranking, over 48 thousandth in the States) which leads today's edition, for example, adoringly, and with no alternative voices, with a staunch religious right talk at Florence Baptist Church, falsely characterising an unabashed evangelical Christian call to arms as a talk on "religious freedom" (the report fails to mention anything at all in the speech about, for example, tolerance of people of other or no faiths); and in another article features a nativity scene exhibition at a local Catholic church. Wikepedians ought to be cautious and circumspect before placing material on its pages. Including this exotic statement is throwing caution to the wind. sirlanz 03:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
