Talk:William Ritzman House

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

Nice pic and nice starter article. I tried changing the infobox type to NRHP2 to show the map location within Illinois, too. Please revert if prefer without. I also like the way the NRIS search is described, setting up how to run the search. Cheers, doncram (talk) 09:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do like the idea, I just don't like the aesthetic of photo-map-info, I think it would work much better, and look better if it went photo-info-map. Thoughts? IvoShandor (talk) 12:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and thanks for the compliments. My style has been ever evolving but the NRIS setup came after a lengthy discussion with an overseas editor who had a terrible time trying to access the NRIS and then, once there, an even worse time trying to figure out how to use it. Since I have come back after my long five month hiatus I have been adding the search query with some specifics on what to search for in the link, location by city is usually the easiest for smaller towns and cities (doesn't work so well for big places). I just hope they don't kill the NRIS once the NPS Focus stuff goes online in full, we have a lot of links to the NRIS around here. IvoShandor (talk) 12:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i agree that photo-info-map order is better, it has been discussed as a change to make in the NRHP2 infobox. I think in every case that I have seen the photo-info-map order is better, and I plan to change that (or get Dudemanfellabra to change it).

That's a good explanation on the importance of making an improved NRIS reference, about the difficulty with an overseas editor. If you don't mind, I will add something about this into the draft WP:NRHPMOS, perhaps using this example. Or please feel free to add about it yourself. Cheers, doncram (talk) 16:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to expand on Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Style guide#Formatting of references to NRIS. Thanks! doncram (talk) 16:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the conversation is on the talk page at 55 Central Park West if I am not mistaken. IvoShandor (talk) 21:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on William Ritzman House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070614114442/http://www.nr.nps.gov/iwisapi/explorer.dll?IWS_SCHEMA=NRIS1&IWS_LOGIN=1&IWS_REPORT=100000039 to http://www.nr.nps.gov/iwisapi/explorer.dll?IWS_SCHEMA=NRIS1&IWS_LOGIN=1&IWS_REPORT=100000039

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]