Talk:Wilson–Cowan model

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Neurology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

[edit]

$S({\bar {N}})=\int _{\frac {\theta }{{\bar {N}}(t)}}^{\infty }C(w)dw$

Where does this integral come from? I cannot find it in the original paper and I doubt its correctness. Example: If the excitation threshold $\theta$ is twice the average excitation ${\bar {N}}$ , then this would integrate over all neurons that have $\omega \geq 2$ afferent synapses. However, in order for a neuron to belong to the excited subpopulation $S({\bar {N}})$ , it should have at least twice the average no. of afferent nerve fibers, not just two afferent synapses (or more). — Preceding unsigned comment added by LoSchizzatore (talk • contribs) 12:53, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]