Talk:Wimpole Estate

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Added reference to community use - and parkrun in particular - with reference to Wimpole parkrun website

National Trust pilot[edit]

Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enahnce coverage of NT sites. You can find the project edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 21:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article title[edit]

Is there any particular reason why this article is called Wimpole Estate rather than Wimpole Hall? As far as I can see, this is the only country house where we've adopted this approach. I appreciate that the article's coverage is wider than the house alone, but that is true of a great many country house articles. Every major English country house of the 16th-19th centuries had an estate attached. Equally, per Common name, I very much doubt that Wimpole Estate is the generally-used term. I'm proposing a Move unless there are any concerns. KJP1 (talk) 08:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you look it up on the National Trust website, the property's name is Wimpole Estate. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 10:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

very true, but I'm not sure that makes it the common name. Hope you liked the addition to Haslemere. KJP1 (talk) 10:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haslemere looks good to me. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 10:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]