Talk:Winner-take-all in action selection

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Seems like a POV-fork of Winner-take-all[edit]

Seems from the leads that they are talking about two separate things, but then this article links directly to the other and redefines it contradictorily. No time to explore the sources and find out, but this article seems more neutral since it doesn't seem to be limiting the subject down to a neural-networking context. The article which linked me to hear was describing a similar phenominon and had some (sparce) sources which make this articles interpretation of "Winner-take-all" more logical than the other. I think the articles should probably be merged, despite being a seemingly cumbersome task at the moment from the technicality of both text and sources. Eaterjolly (talk) 09:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]