Talk:Witchblade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unclear[edit]

The phrase "A male aspect created to act as a balance, which must have a female as a host." is unclear. A male aspect WAS created...? Or is this saying the withblade IS a male aspect? Swrdfghtr 22:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the Witchblade is a male offspring of the Darkness and the Angelus... that's it.

Issues[edit]

I think that the section "Issue events breakdown" can be moved to another page. Which could allow more information included, reduce de size of the main article, and remove potential spoilers from the main page. Comments? --Guille2015 03:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It also needs to be made NPOV.--KrossTalk 12:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A new article called 'List of Witchblade Issues' should be created and have the summaries moved there. LyMinh 01:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


There is no longer any information about issues at all, it looks more like a movie article then about a log running comic series Czarnibog (talk) 11:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yumi picture...[edit]

That Yumi character is supposed to be 15? You can see her butt in the accompanying image. Does anyone else think this is a bit much? Do we need to have it in the article?

I think you're over-reacting a bit. It is a cartoon character after all. And please remember to sign your comments by placing four ~ after your comment. Konczewski 03:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Excalibur3.gif[edit]

Image:Excalibur3.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Witchblade Lost Generation[edit]

Finally found a pic http://www.tokyopop.com/WraithMaster/photo/372699.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.245.122.98 (talk) 17:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The trouble is, that image doesn't have any licensing information associated with it that I can see. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, so a license is needed before uploading it —αlεx•mullεr 17:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering, was Lost Generation a novel, light novel, or manga? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.148.103 (talk) 02:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a light novel. Bonotake (talk) 06:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OTOH, the current title is wrong: not "Midori no Shojo", but "Ao no Shojo" (it was wrongly modified at 20:08, 28 February 2007). The character 碧 can be pronounced as both, but the author shows how to read it on his home page (in Japanese), cf. http://homepage3.nifty.com/ichisato/Write.htm: 

ちなみに、「碧」を「あお」として使うように提案したのは俺。編集サイドでは当初「蒼」を使うことを考えていたらしい。
が、俺は沖縄の海のイメージとして「みどり」とも「あお」とも読める「碧」のほうがいい、と考えてこの漢字を使うことを提案し、了承された次第。
 (On the other hand, I'm the one who proposed to use 碧 for "Ao". Editors once planned to use 蒼 (another kanji for "ao"), 
 but I thought 碧 was better, because the character could be read both as "midori" (green) and "ao" (blue) so that 
 it matched the image of Okinawan sea. Thus I proposed it and they accepted it.)

I'll fix it from now. Bonotake (talk) 06:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Other witchblade weapon?[edit]

I am sure I saw a Witchblade as a staff with two swords on the end, and not only in Dawn of War. Does anyone else know where this is? --98.215.53.250 (talk) 16:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

Should we make a article about the manga? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.248.230.11 (talk) 01:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It strikes me that the article is actually missing a lot of information about the comic series - which should be the core. It makes sense to split off the adaptations to their separate articles so the bulk of the article can be refocused on the comics. The anime and TV series are already split off, the film will be when it is closer to being released, so I think the manga should be too. (Emperor (talk) 17:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Link confusion[edit]

Several of the links in the Witchblade wielders section of the article redirect right back to that section of the article, making the links, in my opinion, useless. Should those links be removed? Heiyuu (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about the existing Witchblade film?[edit]

Why is there nothing in the wiki article about the previous Witchblade film? I mean, I saw it. Three times. I wouldn't know Witchblade at all if not for this movie. Henre (talk) 23:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C-Class rated for Comics Project[edit]

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of bearers[edit]

I'm just wondering if it'd be worth it to actually list what specific issues these bearers are mentioned in - I haven't heard of half the people on the list (or in the case of many of the historical figures, was not aware they were mentioned as bearers). I guess that calls the verifiability into question, right? I think it'd be a lot more helpful if there was some sort of citation listing where those bearers appeared or were mentioned, otherwise anyone could go around adding pretty much any name to that list, making the list even less useless than it already is. Xenomrph (talk) 04:30, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Went ahead and deleted all the ones that couldn't be verified in the comics; I even posted about it on the Top Cow forums and the people there hadn't heard of most of the people on the list. Xenomrph (talk) 02:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Movie Site[edit]

The movie site referenced (link #2, www.witchblade2009.com), seems to be a german generic mmorpg squatter site now. Nonsensical text and paid links and such. Anyone know if there is a new site for the movie or if the whole project was simply scrapped? Iueras (talk) 08:42, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Witchblade Dark Minds The Return of Paradox.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Witchblade Dark Minds The Return of Paradox.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 2 November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:23, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why I removed the Publication history section.[edit]

Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Comics#Lists as article sections and Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics consensus, bulleted lists of appearances should not be included in articles. A publication history section can included such material in prose, but is supposed to contain real-world info such as the creators, dates, and any interesting facts on the creation of the book. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:39, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And that guideline says explicitly: "Care should be taken though to make sure the list is relevant and would not be better handled as prose."
The list is certainly relevant, and I disagree that it would be better handled as prose. It's a useful, encyclopedic list, not much different from listing the discography of a band or episodes of a television show. As the guideline says at the top, "use common sense in applying it". The second bullet of the references section in the guideline clearly applies to this article, and nowhere does it require that such material must be included in prose. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:45, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If there are no followup comments, I will restore the section in a week or so. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:45, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No one has objected, so I have restored the publication history. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:55, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


where is the publication history? Czarnibog (talk) 11:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the section about the movie[edit]

As I noted in a previous post, the movie site witchblade2009.com was a squatter site. Now, it is just plain blank. Obviously this movie is not in the works -- there has been no mention of it for years and the website for it is completely gone. Based on this, I am removing the section about the "upcoming" movie. Iueras (talk) 23:46, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved Armbrust The Homunculus 06:46, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Witchblade → Witchblade (comics) – Helps to avoid confusion with the Witchblade (disambiguation) page and match page title with other pages on the disambiguation page 86.143.47.221 (talk) 00:19, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • I am not sure that is necessary since every other entry on the dabpage is an adaption of the this comic.--174.93.170.47 (talk) 01:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is the comic, not the disambiguation page. This article simply needs a dablink at the top, which it already has. No confusion at all. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose move, the comic book is by far the first and foremost meaning of the word. - WPGA2345 - ☛ 04:28, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merger prosposal[edit]

It has been suggested Ian Nottingham should be merged I personally agree with it. Dwanyewest (talk) 23:57, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gauntlet vs bracelet[edit]

An anonymous IP address continues to revert without explanation, changing the description of the Witchblade from "gauntlet" to "bracelet". It isn't a bracelet. Every single cover of the original comic books show it as a gauntlet. The anime series and TV show also show it as a gauntlet, although it becomes a bracelet after being donned. I am not seeing any source describing it as a bracelet. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Witchblade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Witchblade&oldid=1206063179"