Talk:Witness for the Prosecution (play)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Theatre Assessment[edit]

  • Stub class - No Synopsis or History headings. Good Production/Reception info, incorportate more recent informationas available.
  • Low importance - a single play constitutes "a highly specific area of knowledge."

--Dereksmootz (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot needed[edit]

This article is shit. Richard75 (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In Popular Culture[edit]

I understand that a popular culture section needs more than one example, so I'm putting this here until and unless there's enough more to justify adding it to the article. "The murder mystery Witness in Death, the tenth volume in the long running In Death series by JD Robb starts during the opening night of a new Broadway production of Witness for the Prosecution, but the performance takes a sudden, unexpected turn when the knife used at the climax is a real knife, not a prop and the leading man is killed in front of over 3,000 witnesses, including the series' protagonist, Dallas, Lieutenant Eve, a prominent homicide cop, who quickly takes charge of the scene and investigation." If needed, it can be added that JD Robb is a pen name for Nora Roberts, used to prevent having too many books by the same author on the shelves at the same time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JDZeff (talkcontribs) 22:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First performance[edit]

In the section "Publication and further adaptations", the article says, "The very first performance of the story, just pre-dating the debut of Christie's play, was in the form of a live telecast which aired on CBS Television's Lux Video Theatre on 17 September 1953 . . ." The source cited is The Official Andrea King Website. Several other sources, however, tell of the play's adaptation on The Chevrolet Tele-Theatre before that Lux broadcast.

I don't want to change the current wording of the article on my own because it has an apparently valid source. The sources that I listed, however, raise a question about the accuracy of the "very first performance" statement in the article. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]