This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 21 June 2021 by Elizium23. Error: Disclosures that use the |checked= parameter should also use |editedhere=yes for at least one contributor.
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 21 June 2021 by Elizium23. Error: Disclosures that use the |checked= parameter should also use |editedhere=yes for at least one contributor.
But a concerned editor has just WP:TNT'ed the article and rebuilt it from scratch. Hasn't the COI issue been resolved with respect to content? Chubbles (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We will see. Perhaps this is why the COI editor expressed a desperate need to edit the article immediately. --Deepfriedokra(talk) 16:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra: I’m not sure what purpose the COI tag serves since the accounts in question were blocked and the article cleaned of copyvios. If it was added because of me them I’ll step away. FWIW, I’ve got no connection to the subject. I did ask about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Record Labels#Wonderlick Entertainment and based on the response I received I tried to find some more sources for the article. If my editing of the article created some more problems it was unintentional and they can be reverted. FWIW, I didn’t TNT anything and the current version minus a small paragraph and some citations is basically what was left after all the copyvios were removed. — Marchjuly (talk) 19:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Marchjuly: Thanks for the reminder. Added a bit late; page semi protected from company shills rewriting. Have no idea how you could be COI. Someone from the company expressed an urgent need to edit the page in an unblock request, and it raised my concern. Sorry for the bother. Removed the tag. --Deepfriedokra(talk) 19:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra: The revdeletions are how I came across the article. I saw it being discussed here on Diannaa’s user talk page, took a look, and then asked about it on the WikiProject talk page. Since some at the WikiProject felt quite strongly that the subject was notable, I tried to find more sources. — Marchjuly (talk) 19:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if we now have enough in-depth coverage of the organization in the citations present to establish notability? Editor Robman94 wants to remove the notability tag but I'm not sure, because many of the citations are more like interviews than in-depth coverage or are coverage of various artists signed to the company's record label. (Notability is not inherited from clients.) Opinions welcome.— Diannaa (talk) 03:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This certainly meets WP:MUSIC's sense of one of the more important indies; NOTINHERITED is inapplicable here, so I see no reason not to remove the tag. Chubbles (talk) 03:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
