Talk:WoodSpring Suites

Hotels Mid‑importance

	Hotels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Seancamore (talk) 18:27, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to this and am trying to establish a page for the hotel brand. I cite numerous other players and tried to avoid making it overly simple. I will happily elaborate and change content, with some direction on how to better handle. THANK YOU.

Hello. Based on your note, I've taken down the speedy deletion request. I agree, you did cite competitors, which mitigates concern somewhat. I was reacting particularly to

Most guests are relocating to or within an area, displaced for myriad reasons, traveling for business, in military service, a traveling medical professional, or on vacation or seasonally staying in a geography. The hotel promises comfortable, clean rooms at a fair and reasonable price. Most of the brand's 220+ hotels in 30+ states are pet-friendly and have free wireless internet.

Especially this, but also some of what follows, reads the way PR material published by the company itself might look. Wikipedia articles need to read more neutrally, without looking like they are playing up their topic's quality or desirability and without reading like communications from the topic (that is, the company) would read.

For the time being, instead, I've marked the article with an "advert" tag indicating a maintenance issue and encouraging editors whether you or someone else, to resolve it. Largoplazo (talk) 18:49, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, be cautious about writing with a conflict of interest, which is strongly discouraged. See the guidelines applicable to conflicts of interest. Largoplazo (talk) 18:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]