Talk:Woodham Brothers

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	August 2, 2008

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as High-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historical Impact[edit]

Fascinating article, makes you realise that without Dai Woodham, railway preservation in the UK would be nowhere near as advanced as it is. Would anyone with more knowledge of the subject care to expand on the historical/social impacts of Barry Scrapyard? i.e. what would be different if the yard hadn't concentrated on the wagons first? For example are there any classes of locomotive preserved that wouldn't be had it not been for the Barry examples?

Also is the scrapyard still in operation? ColourSarge (talk) 09:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto: There's a lack of dates, so it's hard to identify the timeline of the article. Ansbaradigeidfran (talk) 14:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it fair to say that if Dai Woodham's company had continued with the scrapping of steam locomotives first then the railway preservation movement as it is today would be very different. Around 200 steam locomotives were rescued and many have been restored to working order, and many of those provide the main attraction at the many heritage railways around the country. If these hadn't been saved then we would only have had the National Collection and the few steam locomotives that were bought directly out of service or who survived in industrial use (for example with the NCB, and London Underground) to represent our steam railway heritage. I would guess that many heritage lines would be more reliant on diesel power to operate. It would be interesting to speculate, especially following the successful building from scratch of an A1 class pacific 'Tornado'- whether a lack of a source of locos from Woodhams' yard would have led to earlier efforts to recreate or design new steam locomotives.

ColourSarge also asked 'are there any classes of locomotive preserved that wouldn't be had it not been for the Barry examples?' to which the answer is an unequivocable 'YES!' - not least in the case of the prototype BR Class 8 pacific 71000 'Duke of Gloucester'. But there are other classes that wouldn't otherwise now be represented - the GW 42xx 2-8-0T and 72xx 2-8-2T (the largest tank engines to run in the UK), the SR 'Q' class 0-6-0 and 'N' class 2-6-0, the LMS Stanier Mogul, and BR 76xxx Mogul 2-6-0 are but a few examples.Andywebby (talk) 01:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Supplemental - The Bullied light pacifics (West Country and Battle of Britain classes) as rebuilt with Walschaerts valve gear and the air smoothed casing removed in the 1950s are further examples (10 survived) Andywebby (talk) 23:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A further thought - the supply of locos from the yard has enabled some projects to go ahead to recreate otherwise extinct locomotive classes. Two examples: GW Hall Class 'Maindy Hall' is being converted into a GW Saint Class loco 'Lady of Legend', and, as it lacks a tender, BR Standard Class 2 2-6-0 78059 is to be used in a project to recreate a Class 2 2-6-2 tank locomotive, no 84030 (the next available number in the original series). Andywebby (talk) 22:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Woodham Brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090727093828/http://woodhambrosltd.co.uk/ to http://woodhambrosltd.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]