Talk:Worcester, Massachusetts firsts

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rznemo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contraceptive[edit]

"The combined oral contraceptive pill was developed by the Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology in the Worcester suburb of Shrewsbury."

should this realy be here? it didnt happen in Worcester therefore why is it on a list of Worcester Firsts. It happed in Shrewsbury. --Found5dollar (talk) 14:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it doesn't seem to make sense to have something that didn't happen in Worcester on this list. I have been working on editing this page so I will make that change. (I realize that this comment is quite old but I felt I should note that I was addressing the concern this comment noted.) --Rznemo (talk) 22:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Format of Article and Broken Links for References[edit]

The format of this article is a little hard to read. Maybe it would be better if the contents were listed in bullet points with the year first? I think updating the format would make this article more readable. I'm not sure what the best way to format this would be. Also a lot of the references have broken links or lead to sites that no longer exist.
Rznemo (talk) 18:40, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Events that Don't Belong[edit]

There were a couple points in this article that I wasn't sure were needed.

"1848 – Worcester blacksmith Albert Tolman is said to have invented the rickshaw for a missionary traveling to South America. (There are, however, numerous other theories about the origin of the rickshaw.)" If there were numerous theories and it is unknown if it was actually invented in Worcester should this be included?
"2010 – The David Clark Company designed and built a pressure suit for Felix Baumgartner's world-record skydive attempt." Although this seems like a notable event in Worcester I am not sure if it would fall under a "first" so maybe it doesn't necessarily belong in this article.

--Rznemo (talk) 22:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]