This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
The English sources don't immediately demonstrate notability to me, most of the available coverage are rehashes of press releases. If there is independent WP:SIGCOV available in Chinese, then it could be good to point those sources out. Otherwise it might be preferable to expand the section on ByteDance#Xigua_Video – Thjarkur(talk) 13:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Thjarkur: Thanks for looking into this! It's true that some of the coverage is derived from press releases, but several of the sources I cited are legitimate WP:SIGCOV, like the articles from SCMP, China Film Insider and KrAsia.
Your point about Chinese media is well taken, though. There are dozens of examples of WP:SIGCOV in Chinese, but I hesitated to add them because of the language barrier and because it's sometimes difficult to discern which Chinese outlets are considered WP:RS. Here are some Chinese-language articles from over the years that appear to be strong sources to me (all significant coverage, no passing mentions): [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. There are also numerous Chinese sources cited in the article on Chinese Wikipedia.
Do you know of any experienced Chinese-speaking Wikipedians who would be willing to evaluate the notability of Xigua Video in light of all the coverage in Chinese-language media? Thanks, JatBD (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Chinese coverage does look decent and appears sufficient for demonstrating notability (judging from a Google Translate). I don't have permission to move the article to mainspace since there's a redirect in the way, would suggest adding {{subst:submit}} to your draft. – Thjarkur(talk) 17:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Thjarkur: Would it make sense to post at WP:RM/TR? It seems like a shame for the draft to sit for up to 4 months at AfC when the only thing holding it back is a technical barrier. JatBD (talk) 13:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
