Talk:Yasmina Siadatan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Philip Glenister?[edit]

Somebody added that Yasmina moved into a flat with Kate and Philip Glenister. He's not a fellow contestant, he's an actor from Life On Mars and Ashes To Ashes! I replaced him with Philip Taylor, an estate agent.

£100,000 prize?[edit]

She didnt win a £100,000 and a job with Sir Alan, her job has a salary of £100,000. The information here is incorrect. (90.203.39.44 (talk) 19:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Recent career[edit]

There are some details of Yasmina Siadatan's post-Sugar career in the Independent:

Since leaving Amscreen Healthcare in 2010, Siadatan was headhunted by rival TV entrepreneur James Caan's business Hamilton Bradshaw to work as head of operations.
There she works as project director of Caan's Start-Up Loans company, a government funded initiative that backs young people aged 18-30 to start their own business by providing low interest loans.
She continues to own restaurant Mya Lacarte in Caversham, which specialises in produce grown in Britain.
Wyatt, Daisy (15 May 2013). "The Apprentice winners: Where are they now?". The Independent.

This Financial News article covers the job move in a bit more detail:

Porter, Kiel (7 January 2013). "Apprentice winner teams up with Dragon". Financial News. -- Hillbillyholiday talk 20:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Father's polygamy[edit]

From the Telegraph:

The 27-year-old restaurant owner said that her polygamous father even reminded her of her new boss, Sir Alan Sugar. Medi, who now lives in the Middle East, once campaigned unsuccessfully for British law to allow him to have more than one wife, even taking his case to the European Court of Human Rights.
He once justified his lifestyle remarking: "Just as a lion has four females in his pride so a man can take up to four women."
Bingham, John (8 June 2009). "The Apprentice: winner Yasmina Siadatan says father is like Sir Alan Sugar". The Telegraph. -- Hillbillyholiday talk 21:12, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting for deletion[edit]

Another editor considers much of the content contentious and the references unreliable. What is now left is little more than a promotional piece for the subject's restaurant. I therefore think the article should be deleted.Tomintoul (talk) 21:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]