Talk:Yeardley Smith/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The article does not have obvious problems that would warrant a quick-fail. decltype (talk) 19:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality: Relies heavily on quotations, but it's a very good read.
- B. MoS compliance: Overall very good.
It seems a bit odd that the the video game credits is a list while the others are tables. Any specific reason for that?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
I was expecting a mention of her role in Ginger Ale Afternoon, even if it's only a small point in her career. - B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
I turned the video games section into a table. Not sure about Ginger Ale Afternoon. I'll let User:Scorpion0422 or User:Gran2 take care of that. TheLeftorium 09:30, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Of course, WP:DUE applies, but I think a small mention is warranted. decltype (talk) 16:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)