Talk:You're Still the One

You're Still the One has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 2, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
November 18, 2006	Good article reassessment	Kept
April 23, 2007	Good article reassessment	Delisted
September 9, 2023	Good article nominee	Listed
Current status: Good article

Canada: Music Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Country Music High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Country MusicTemplate:WikiProject Country MusicCountry Music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Musicnotes.com[edit]

Going by Musicnotes.com to determine the key of a song is not a good idea as that's the key pianist transcribers prefer, vis Elton John at Dick James with a Beatles catalogue where they never played in Eb. Brett Alexander Hunter (talk) 03:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Um, Orleans song of similar title?[edit]

Why no reference? - Darkhawk

I don't know, why is there no reference to this song from "Still the One"?? --Thankyoubaby 02:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article[edit]

I passed the article. mrholybrain 22:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been delisted, as it fails criterion 1 ("well written") — it does not conform to the Manual of Style. Specifically, see WP:MUSIC/TABLE for the proper layout of the indiscriminately collected information that makes up over a third of the article. --keepsleeping slack off! 16:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'd say it stays as a Good Article and it looks like it's 2 to 1, so it will stay that way. --Thankyoubaby 03:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As there seems to be some debate I've now taken this to Wikipedia:Good articles/Review. --Salix alba (talk) 12:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clarity?[edit]

while it was the first to be released to pop and international markets. Does this mean it was the first of her songs to be released to those markets? -Malkinann 21:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it does. --Thankyoubaby 07:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steel solo[edit]

Does anyone know if the steel guitar solo in this song was played backwards? It sure sounds like it. TenPoundHammer 11:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

I've listed this article at good article review, where I've noted some concerns about this article. ShadowHalo 08:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA delisted[edit]

This article was delisted per the now archived Good article review and the instructions at said archive. IvoShandor 11:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on You're Still the One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on You're Still the One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on You're Still the One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160315194458/http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/rpm/028020-119.01-e.php?brws_s=1&file_num=nlc008388.6973&type=1&interval=24 to http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/rpm/028020-119.01-e.php?brws_s=1&file_num=nlc008388.6973&type=1&interval=24

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:You're Still the One/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 17:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TenPoundHammer Hello! Thank you for the review. Regarding the song's performance on the Canadian charts, in the "Commercial performance" section there is information about the song's performance on the Canadian RPM Singles, Adult Contemporary and Country charts. Best regards, TabooMatters94 (talk) 20:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Good work so far. Just a couple minor things and this should pass.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
No issues spotted here. Made a couple minor tweaks. Added a {{Use Canadian English}} for good measure and fixed some {{cite AV media notes}} errors.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Spot-checked several newspapers.com sources and they all contained the proper information without any evidence of OR.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I would recommend adding the song's performance on the Canadian charts to the "commercial performance" section, as Twain is Canadian.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
All images have proper alt tags as well.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Good work. Only addition should be the Canadian charts and then this is good to pass.

I feel that the minor issues have been addressed, so this is now passed as a good article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]