Talk:Young v. Facebook, Inc./GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 16:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I will do this review.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- After reading the WP:LEAD and Facts section, I am impressed. However, subsequent sections seem to be sparse. I will probably have some requests for further detail. I think one section should be devoted to each of the six causes of action. I am not a legal scholar and think that the average person will get lost if you name 6 actions and have 4 sections describing them.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- After considering this article, I think it fails for lack of breadth. I would expect that each action has a section at least as substantive as the facts section. Then the two court rulings should have large sections. This article is terribly incomplete.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)