Talk:Yuzhno-Russkoye field

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I'm not sure, but I think Yuzhno-Russkoye field is a gas field and it isn't an oil fiel. --HUB es 02:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

5.7 million tonnes oil[edit]

It seems like it is not just written but done by Wikipedia the calculation... 14MMbbl (strange, but I think it means 14 million barrels?!) is wrong! Usually 1 ton = 7.3 barrel is taken as average standard. 5.7 million tons of oil are around 41,610,000 barrel and not 14,000,000. It is a very small field even with almost 42 million barrel, but its 3 times as much as written... they will only take the oil which comes out by gas production I guess, I do not think they will drill for oil, or maybe very few wells, but now at this oil price for sure they will not drill a small baby oil-field, only if gas and oil is delivered from the production well... Greetings Kilon22 (talk) 13:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kilon22, should be fixed. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 21:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yuzhno-Russkoye field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]