Talk:Zig-zag bridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Other origins?[edit]

I recall hearing folkloric origins for this type of design as well- that certain types of evil supernatural entities traveled across water only in straight lines. Could be complimentary with (or predate) the Zen explanation. --Spasemunki (talk) 22:09, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zig-zag bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant article?[edit]

There are two articles, one on "Zigzag bridges" and one on "Nine-turn bridges," but my understanding is that they are the same. Is there a distinction to be made, or should these articles be merged?

Nine-turn bridge Breich9 (talk) 15:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]