Talk:Zoe Tate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment[edit]

"She is an interesting character to whom many interesting things have happened and who has done many remarkable things. She has been kidnapped, tortured and raped and has committed arson and murder."

Rape is interesting and/or remarkable? Odd choice of adjectives there. Haha! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goatboy (talkcontribs) 20:23, 12 April 2007

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zoe Tate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quote from The Sunday Mail[edit]

Instead of edit warring, @WikiFandom10: please explain and discuss why you think the quote from the Sunday Mail should be removed. Bennv123 (talk) 15:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It just displays information that I don’t think should be on here. It’s just insulting and I don’t find it appropriate that she has been described the way she has, everyone has varying opinions okay I can’t change that but the way she’s been described, I don’t find it appropriate. If you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say it WikiFandom10 (talk) 16:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is here to display a neutral point of view, showing both positives and negatives. I wrote Meena Jutla and it pained me to include negative opinions but I had to, so that it was fully representative of people's reception to her. – Meena • 16:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]