The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rlink2 (talk) 00:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Overall: @Dora the Axe-plorer: Good article. Going to approve in good faith due to foreign language sources. Onegreatjoke (talk) 13:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
The source says "probably the first aftershock study", but the hook assert this as a known fact. I think we need to tweak the wording in the hook. -- RoySmith(talk) 23:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
ALT blurb 1 ... that the first probable scientific study of aftershocks following a destructive earthquake was undertaken after the 1920 Xalapa earthquake?
Proposed the alt blurb. Will change the article as well.Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
@Dora the Axe-plorer: Good article. 
Going to approve in good faith due to foreign language sources. Onegreatjoke (talk) 13:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
The source says "probably the first aftershock study", but the hook assert this as a known fact. I think we need to tweak the wording in the hook. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
