Template:Did you know nominations/Adriatic sturgeon
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Adriatic sturgeon[edit]
... that although the Adriatic sturgeon may be extinct in the wild, a large fish was caught in the River Po in 2015?
- Reviewed: Stanley Booth-Clibborn
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC).
The article is 5x expanded, well-written and I do not find any copyright issues. The hook is very interesting and finds mention in the appropriate places with good sources for citations. However, I think the hook needs a slight rewording as the "may be" may imply that the fish is actually extinct in the wild. Also "fish" could be replaced by "specimen". How about :
- ALT1: ... that although it is possible that the Adriatic sturgeon is extinct in the wild, a large specimen was caught in the River Po in 2015? Sainsf (talk) 19:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- I am happy with ALT1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Very well, this one should be good to go. Good job! Sainsf <^>Talk all words 16:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
