Template:Did you know nominations/Child sexual abuse in Australia

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Child sexual abuse in Australia[edit]

(

)

~~... that of about 48,420 cases of child abuse in Australian states and territories in 2011–12, 5,828 of them involved sexual abuse?~~

Created by OccultZone (talk). Self nominated at 18:44, 12 April 2014 (UTC).

At 1228 bytes, this one is too short too. Note that the Notable offenders section doesn't count towards the total (because it's a list). Sven Manguard Wha? 04:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

@Sven Manguard:, I had added a new section, named 'other studies', it is about 650 characters. OccultZone (Talk) 14:02, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Full review needed now that article meets minimum DYK length requirement. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Also needs a better hook; the current one is not suitable for obvious reasons. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:48, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

@Demiurge1000:, changed the hook. OccultZone (Talk) 17:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I've tweaked the proposed hook a bit. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

New enough, long enough, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook ref verified and cited inline. Page creator appears to have less than 5 DYKs, so no QPQ needed. I'm ready to run with this hook, but I wonder if you'd like to use one of the statistics that I added to the Other studies section. Either the statistic for psychiatric patients, or the statistic for prisoners who were sexually abused as children, are very hooky and would have less numbers for the hook reader to process. Yoninah (talk) 20:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

There is no problem in using either. As long as they are informative. OccultZone (Talk) 17:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

ALT1: ... that 65% of male and female prisoners in New South Wales were sexually abused as children? Yoninah (talk) 18:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes that is even more interesting. OccultZone (Talk) 18:28, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. Unfortunately, I can't approve my own hook. Could another reviewer sign off on this, please? Yoninah (talk) 18:37, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

ALT1 is stated in the article and sourced offline. — Maile (talk) 23:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

It's actually sourced online and linked in the article. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 01:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)