Template:Did you know nominations/Crisis on Infinite Earths (Arrowverse)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 06:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Original GA review was reverted, and subsequent review ended in failure; article does not qualify for DYK.

Crisis on Infinite Earths (Arrowverse)

Improved to Good Article status by Favre1fan93 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC).

  • @Favre1fan93: Promoted to GA on 28th October, sourced and neutral. Earwig flagged quotes and titles therefore it's 56.9% but it should be fine. Hooks interesting and referenced. Images in the article are either free or fair use. QPQ done. ALT1 seems more interesting, but it currently links to the comic book, not the crossover, so please fix that. Corachow (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @Corachow: My apologies about the incorrect link in ALT1, I've fixed that. I looked at the Earwig, and yes many of the top ones flagged are for the reviews where quotes are used. The second link is Rotten Tomatoes, and the third EW source I'm not sure why it's flagging so high. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • For the EW article, Earwig was mainly flagging quotes, names and titles, if possible I would suggest rephrasing the sentence The Smallville material in the crossover was shared with Smallville co-creator Alfred Gough before filming began in the writing section. Corachow (talk) 17:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • It should be fine then. Good to go. Corachow (talk) 21:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Formally putting an icon to prevent premature promotion while discussion is ongoing. Will remove it if the decision is not to reopen the review. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  • The review was reverted, and a subsequent review by an experienced reviewer has been failed. The nominator has requested that it be reopened, so this DYK nomination should not be closed until a response is made by the reviewer. It will always be possible to submit a new DYK nomination should the GA review stand. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
  • The reviewer has responded and will not be reopening the review. Since the article is not a GA, the DYK nomination cannot continue. Closing as unsuccessful. Note that should a subsequent GA nomination succeed, a new DYK nomination can be made at that time. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)