Template:Did you know nominations/Henry Lowenfeld
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 10:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Henry Lowenfeld[edit]
Kops Brewery, Fulham
- ... that in 1890, Henry Lowenfeld, a Polish immigrant, established the UK's first brewer of non-alcoholic beer, in Fulham, London (pictured)?
- Reviewed: One Hundred And Eighty
- Comment: other hooks welcome
Created by Edwardx (talk). Self-nominated at 22:34, 27 August 2015 (UTC).
Article was nominated within time limit. It was only 1,244 chars long when it was nominated on August 27. Failed to meet the prose portion length requirement. The sentence in the "Early life" section lacks reference at its end. The year "1890" is repeated in the first sentence of "Career" section (informal only). Dup detector bot found no paraphrasing issues. I was not able to browse ref #2. It is neutral. The hook is interesting, and is well cited. Its length is within limit. The image is ©-free. QPQ was not done yet. CeeGee 18:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
If the article isn't long enough when reviewed, we typically give the nominator a chance to bring it up to minimum length. I just checked, and it's well over the minimum length at 2550 prose characters, and indeed was 1918 prose characters by the end of the day on which it was nominated (August 27), well over the minimum required. The other issues do need fixing, including the lack of a QPQ, which should certainly have been supplied long before now. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: I see the time stamps on my site as follows: The DYK was nominated at 22:34, 27 August 2015. The last edit before the nomination was at 03:06, August 21, 2015 showing 1,244 chars definitely. The next immediate edit took place at 01:28, August 28, 2015 expanding the article to 1,669 chars. Sorry, I was not aware of such a custom to give the nominator a chance. CeeGee 04:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- CeeGee, this nomination template was created at 22:34 UTC on the 27th. Edwardx made five edits that same day, between 22:28 UTC and 22:49 UTC, from six minutes before to fifteen minutes after the nomination. all on the 27th. DYK and Wikipedia in general goes by UTC; you seem to be going by UTC+3 if your history display shows that first edit as occurring at 01:28 the following day. That's why I said Edwardx had the article to 1918 prose characters before the end of the day on August 27: I was going by UTC. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: I refer to the time of the DYK nomination not to the of creation. On the other hand, it doesn't matter what time zone I use as soon as I don't change the time zone in that time span. CeeGee 06:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Review needs to be completed now that QPQ has been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Article was new enough when nom, long enough, hook is interesting and under char limit, neutrally written, no apparent copyvios. Photo appears to be free use. QPQ completed. Hook is verified in citation shown, though notation is at the end of the paragraph and not the sentence is technically correct, since all data in the paragraph is contained in the source and no other source intervenes. Citation which prior reviewer noted was missing has been corrected. GTG SusunW (talk) 21:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
