Template:Did you know nominations/Holly Beth Vincent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Zanhe (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Ineligible, not an unsourced BLP

Holly Beth Vincent[edit]

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by Lewismaster (talk). Self-nominated at 10:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC).

  • @Lewismaster: I have started reviewing this article. However, this version seems to be "BLP more sources needed" rather than "BLP unsourced". I'm going to post for help at WT:DYK, but here's the rest of the review. epicgenius (talk) 15:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

  • Adequate sourcing: No - Two statements with an obvious {{citation needed}}:
    • While in New York City, she featured in the indie film "The Dwarf" (1984) directed by Richard Monteverde starring Ann "Anna" Magnuson and studied acting briefly with teacher Catherine Gaffigan.
    • She has been voice artist in national commercials for Nike, Nintendo, Pepsi and Squirt.
  • Neutral: Yes
  • Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: No - There are a few sentences that need to be fixed per Copyvio detector.
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

QPQ: Unknown
Invalid status "n" - use one of "y", "?", "maybe", "no" or "again"

  • @Lewismaster: I am sorry, but according to our rules (DYK criterion 1c), it must be an expansion from a completely unsourced version (the newness criterion deals with Former unsourced BLPs (such as those in this category)). You can try nominating this article for GA status, and then nominating this article for DYK again afterward. epicgenius (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your review. I unduerstand that the criterion is not met. To the next... Lewismaster (talk) 20:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC)