Template:Did you know nominations/Meeting at Night

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 10:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Meeting at Night[edit]

Browning in 1888

Created by Solomon7968 (talk). Self nominated at 08:38, 5 October 2013 (UTC).

  • The article is long enough. The hook is not too long. qpq done. The image is free, used in the article and show up well at small size. I am uncertain if the hook is directly supported with the source which says that this song was "the most sensual poem he had yet created". I am not native speaker of English so I apologize if I am wrong. Does word "yet" mean "until then"?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:23, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I am maybe exaggerating with this because I don't know much about this topic but I guess that if this was the most sensual poem Browning ever wrote the source would most likely say so. "Yet" maybe even indicate that it wasn't? I would not be surprised because from little what I've just read in article about her, I could imagine that she was quite inspiring. In that case ALT1 does not resolve this issue because Browning probably wrote more sensual poetry after Night poem in 1845. Maybe it is better to hint that with the following quote (this is really challenging for my English language skills so please carefully check the wording):
  • ALT2: ... that in 1845 Robert Browning (pictured) met Elizabeth Barrett and wrote "Meeting at Night", the most sensual poem he has ever written before? --Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:53, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I was struggling to think of such a hook (BTW, I am also not native speaker of English) but the ALT2 sums it up well. I am fine with it. Solomon7968 15:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks. ALT2 hook is not too long (140 characters) and contains assertion directly supported by the source. AGF on couple of offline sources. Since both nominator and reviewer are not native English speakers additional check of the text of the article and hook would be appreciated. OK for ALT2.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)