Template:Did you know nominations/Mira Jalosuo

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 ^talk 10:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues

Mira Jalosuo[edit]

(

)

... that Mira Jalosuo, who plays for the Finland women's national ice hockey team in the 2014 Winter Olympics, was the last player cut from the 2010 games?

Reviewed: Street Artists Program of San Francisco
Comment: Technically I am a few hours late in posting this under the nomination timing deadline (I had some power outages due to the storm that delayed me) but in a fit of WP:IGNORE, I'd ask that it be considered anyway, since it meets the criteria in all other ways

Created by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nominated at 20:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC).

The QPQ that you've done for Street Artists Program of San Francisco is incomplete. Besides the "date, length, hook", you need to check the sources for close paraphrasing, make sure the hook is cited inline in the text of the article, and confirm that the nominator has done a QPQ. Please see Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide for a list of reviewing standards. Yoninah (talk) 18:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- It appears the nominator is now addressing these concerns and that further discussion in happening on the article's talk page. Apologies if I wasn't thorough enough the first time. — Hun ter Ka hn 16:55, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflist) Not bothered about being a few hours late. Article is well reffed and of the right length. The hook fact was not reffed to the correct source but I've fixed that. I have also added a wikidata link to the Finnish version. Not sure about close paraphrasing though. I looked here and the facts arranged there have been converted into sentences in the article. It could be argued that the source is just uncopyrightable facts but the article uses identical phrases. What do you think? Victuallers (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for not responding sooner. Certainly this was nothing unintentional. I should have time to look at this later today and try to make the necessary changes. — Hun ter Ka hn 16:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  - I've not had much time to address this lately because of my newborn baby, so if you'd like to fail the nomination, that would be OK. I fully intend to resolve the issue in the article at a later time. — Hun ter Ka hn 18:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

- - Hunter Kahn, congratulations. I hope you're getting sleep. I don't know how long the DYK bosses will let this ride; I could ask BlueMoonset but they're probably busy. I had a look at the article and I agree that those bits need to be rewritten; I was going to try it but, ahem, I got, well, bored almost immediately. Sorry--it's not you, it's hockey. Anyway, see what you can do. All the best, new parent, Drmies (talk) 03:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

It's been another two weeks (three since Victuallers first noticed the problem), and the close paraphrasing remains unaddressed. Under the circumstances, I think it's time to close the nomination as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)