Template:Did you know nominations/Novelist
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Ohc ¡digame! 03:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Novelist[edit]
- ... that romance and thriller writer James Patterson (pictured) was the top earning novelist of 2010, making $70 million?
- Comment: I expanded from a redirect, and moved it from a draft into mainspace on the 11th.
Created by Sadads (talk). Self nominated at 15:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC).
Article hasn't been expanded 5x in the past 5 days. It was expanded over a period of months starting in December 2013. However, can it be considered a new page because it was only moved from user space into the main space on 11th Feb and replaced a redirect with an article? If that is acceptable, it is good to go: hook is of a good length and referenced; the article is more than long enough, well referenced, no problems; image is has no usage restrictions (ShareAlike) and is relevant. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 18:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Gaia Octavia Agrippa: Historically that is the case per the eligibility requirement # 1.d and #1.b. I merged the history of the original redirect, so as to maintain the history from Early Wikipedia, and the earlier version of the article was simply a list of novelists, that has since developed into List of novelists, Sadads (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
You are correct. DYK is good to go. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 19:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
