Template:Did you know nominations/Old Fort Park and Golf Course

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Old Fort Park and Golf Course[edit]

Created by Coinmanj (talk). Self nominated at 05:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough, longer than 1,500 characters of prose, no problems with the article, and the hook is under 200 characters. I changed "surviving remnants" to "remains" to make it a bit tighter. One minor point: should "earthenwork" be "earthwork"? I won't change it myself as it may be a difference between British and American English, but in British texts earthworks is the common term. Nev1 (talk) 18:33, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
  • The original 1960 report done by the US National Park Service, which is reference #7, uses "earthenwork."Coinmanj (talk) 20:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)