Template:Did you know nominations/Pilak, Tripura and Tripura Government Museum

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Pilak, Tripura, Tripura Government Museum[edit]

( Back to T:TDYK )

( Article history links:

)

Tripura Government Museum

... that sandstone sculptures of the Pilak site, which represents a heterodox culture of Hinduism and Buddhism, are on display at the Tripura Government Museum (pictured)?

Reviewed:Template:Did you know nominations/Angus M. Woodbury, Template:Did you know nominations/Natwar Thakkar

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 12:11, 2 October 2015 (UTC).

Will review the two articles shortly. Epic Genius (talk) 19:24, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
So, basically I did a preliminary check, and it looks like both articles' prose sizes have been recently expanded. Pilak, Tripura, has been expanded 5 times, while Tripura Government Museum is brand-new. Epic Genius (talk) 19:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
@Nvvchar: Here is another alt. I'm not convinced that the current hook is catchy enough.

ALT1: ...that 700 to 1,100-year-old sandstone sculptures of the Pilak site, which represents a heterodox culture of Hinduism and Buddhism, are on display at the Tripura Government Museum (pictured)?

Otherwise, plagiarism/neutrality and citation concerns don't seem to be a problem. Epic Genius (talk) 21:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Review for Pilak, Tripura:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Invalid status "done" - use one of "y", "?", "maybe", "no" or "again"

Review for Tripura Government Museum:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Invalid status "done" - use one of "y", "?", "maybe", "no" or "again"

@Epicgenius: Thanks for the review. QPQs done. I am slightly modifying the hook as ALT2 ... that sandstone sculptures of the Pilak site, which represents a heterodox culture of Hinduism and Buddhism of 8th to 13th century are on display at the Tripura Government Museum (pictured)?Nvvchar. 02:40, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

@Nvvchar: That new alt looks good. I'm just going to modify it a little grammatically.

ALT3 ... that sandstone sculptures of the Pilak site, which represents a heterodox culture of Hinduism and Buddhism from the 8th to 13th centuries, are on display at the Tripura Government Museum (pictured)?

Otherwise, it looks all good. QPQ is done, so basically good to go if you approve of ALT2/ALT3. Epic Genius (talk) 02:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, @Epicgenius:. I agree with ALT3 which is a slight grammatical modification of ALT2.Nvvchar. 02:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Then I believe we're all set. Thank you for your contributions to these articles, @Nvvchar. I guess I'll wish these DYKs good luck. Epic Genius (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: Thanks. Please give a green tick of approval.Nvvchar. 04:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

@Nvvchar: Good To Go (Sorry, I didn't get a ping that time.) Epic Genius (talk) 21:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)