The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Overall: This isn't necessary for DYK, but I would archive the sources so as not to have dead URLs in the references in the future. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 15:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
@Xwejnusgozo: Sorry but I don't know how to archive the sources. EdChem (talk) 17:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Promoter: I have requested access to an image of this new species (recognised in 2016), please do not promote this to prep for a little while I see if I can get the image. Thanks. EdChem (talk) 17:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
@Xwejnusgozo: I have added an image and modified the hook, would you please look at its acceptability? Thanks. EdChem (talk) 08:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Image free and clear, good to go. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 10:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)