Template:Did you know nominations/Sophia Taylor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Sophia Taylor[edit]

Sophia Taylor

  • Reviewed: Bit of a strange one. I reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Phase retrieval, which after a bit of mucking around was almost DYK ready when the nominator withdrew it. The nomination template was then deleted (don't ask me why).
  • Comment: Recent expansion.

Created/expanded by Gadfium (talk), Schwede66 (talk). Nominated by Schwede66 (talk) at 18:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Solid 5x expansion. Hook source and date check out. Image is public domain. Ready to go. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes, it would. I didn't know that there's a specific day, but we (Wikiproject New Zealand) are this month expanding a few articles of New Zealand suffragists. It's 8 March here already, so somebody better promote this swiftly :) Schwede66 19:13, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm concerned that some of the phrasings in this article may be too close to those of the sources, particularly this source. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:03, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
  • I have reworded some of the phrasings. Please let me know if you think others are too closely paraphrasing.-gadfium 04:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Quite a bit of rewording has been done by Orlady now. Would you like to be added as a contributor (if so, I'd be happy to add you to the credit list), or would you like to appear as a reviewer? Schwede66 20:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

That's a terrible hook. It's utterly uninteresting. How about ALT1:

Kaldari (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

ALT1 is fine by me. I have added two wikilinks to it. Schwede66 22:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
  • As noted above, I spent some time with this article, mainly focused on edits to further reduce a perception of close paraphrasing. I think the concerns should be resolved -- but I hope that Gadfium and Schwede66 will forgive me (and correct my errors) if I distorted any content. I started out to re-review the article, and I'll finish that task. The ALT1 hook is a good one; I agree with Kaldari that the original hook suggestion is less interesting. --Orlady (talk) 03:18, 9 March 2012 (UTC)