Template:Did you know nominations/Supersisters

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 14:37, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Supersisters[edit]

(

)

... that Jane Pauley, Margaret Mead, and Gloria Steinem were Supersisters?

Reviewed: Drexel 4175

Created/expanded by Gamaliel (talk). Self nominated at 23:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC).

Article new enough and long enough. Paragraph one needs sourcing, as does the table of who was on the cards. QPQ done. No image. Hook is not sourced at the minute, but is interesting. Article is neutral and no copyvios found in spotchecks. AGF on one offline ref. Thanks, Mat ty.007 19:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

@Matty.007: I've added a citation to the introductory paragraph. The hook is cited to sources 4 and 5 in the second to last sentence of paragraph 2. I did save a copy of the offline article, citation 1, for my own use while writing the article, and you can review it here if you wish. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 18:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

The PDF didn't work for me, so AGF on offline source. Mead and Steinem sourced to ref 5, book not working for me ("unavailable for viewing"), so AGF on offline source there too. I think the table needs sourcing. Thanks, Mat ty.007 18:30, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

@Matty.007:

try this link for ref 1: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wmtryfld35dd7wa/supersisters.pdf
try this link for ref 5: https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=EgAhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=DHUFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1525%2C1560245

Sorry for the late reply, I've been out of town for a conference. The individual cards are viewable online at the University of Iowa library, and the names and numbers are verifiable that way. I'm not sure what format to use to cite the table, and seventy two citations for each individual card seems excessive. What do you suggest? Gamaliel (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps a cite only to the library website? Pinging BlueMoonset who probably knows better than me. Thanks, Mat ty.007 18:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

@Matty.007: I tried that suggestion, what do you think? I did not add the footnote to the "occupation" column because all of that language is original and based on various Wikipedia articles or other sources. 22:34, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

@Matty.007: Is there anything else I can do to improve the article to get this DYK passed? Thanks. Gamaliel (talk) 21:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Very sorry, missed this on my watchlist. Just fix the orphan tag then good to go. Thanks, Mat ty.007 11:07, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

@Matty.007: Done, thanks! Gamaliel (talk) 13:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry again, but this is now good to go. Thanks, Mat ty.007 13:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)