Template talk:Colombian Primera A

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconColombia Template‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis template has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFootball Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Junior de Barranquilla[edit]

Regarding the recent edits involving the link to the club Junior in this and other similar articles/templates which are threatening to turn into an edit war, let's consider something: the links on this wiki have been shortened to "Junior" for several years, in several articles, and there hasn't been much of an issue about it until now that someone appears and decides to revert past contributions by others and edit them in such an adamant and reckless fashion without at least giving a reason for it. Also, the usage of Junior to refer to the club is just as acceptable and widely practised in Colombia as the usage of the longer names of Junior de Barranquilla and Atlético Junior, to which I should add that the latter name is not that widely used nowadays as more people are now referring to them as Junior de Barranquilla. I personally have no issue with "Atlético Junior" as the title of the wiki article on the club, but what I ask is that these conventions that have been used here for such a long time are respected in some way. Thanks! CodeMars04 (talk) 18:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]