Template talk:Did you know/Arctic policy of Russia

Arctic policy of Russia[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know, unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted

... that Russia planted a flag at the North Pole as part of its new arctic policy?

5x expanded by Slon02 (talk). Self nom at 01:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Length, format, content rules: Cambalachero (talk) 04:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source: The sentence "...on the seabed below the North Pole." at "Territorial claims" should have a footnote immediately after it. It may be a footnote used more than once, if needed, but the sentence saying what the hook says MUST be referenced. Cambalachero (talk) 04:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest: Cambalachero (talk) 04:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable: No pictures
ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article

Length: Cambalachero (talk) 03:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage: Cambalachero (talk) 03:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): Cambalachero (talk) 03:56, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality: There's no mention to the criticism to this artic policies. In particular, I remember the issue of the flag on the seabed in the news, and although I do not remember who or under which terms, I do remember that it was heavily critizised. It's not needed to go into full detail, a simple mention to the cristicism should be enough. Cambalachero (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: Cambalachero (talk) 04:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio: Cambalachero (talk) 04:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting: Reference 19 is before the comma, it should be afterwards. Cambalachero (talk) 04:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments/discussion:

~~Awaiting improvements detailed above Cambalachero (talk) 04:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)~~[reply]

I've made changes to reflect the comments made here. --Slon02 (talk) 04:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go now Cambalachero (talk) 17:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Template:Did you know/Queue/_ on ____ by ____.