Template talk:Did you know/Dick Gordon (sports writer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dick Gordon (sports writer)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know, unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle

5x expanded by Cbl62 (talk), Gordgus (talk). Nominated by BusterD (talk) at 15:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion: The article is currently at AFD. That will need to be resolved before this can be approved. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 16:50, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Awaiting that disposition. BusterD (talk) 16:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Found the following things in my close paraphrasing check: first, "where he was the first in the country to report the famous decision by Bobby Jones to retire from competitive golf in 1930" in the source, and "being the first reporter in the United States to report the decision by professional golfer Bobby Jones to retire from the sport in 1930" in the article (and the phrase "competitive golf" shows up in the lead).
      • Would feel better if that "competitive golf" was modified in the lead (since that phrasing matches that in the source), but this is improved. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • "Dick and his wife Adelaide (who died in 2007) were married for 61 years" in the source, and "Gordon and his wife, Adelaide, were married for 61 years before she died in 2007" in the article. Not the easiest thing to re-word, but still a little close.
      • Does one of the sources give the wedding year? I don't remember them doing so. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • Done. You got me there. That's "original math". Sorry. Fixed it anyway, by citation. Plus I was wrong, so good catch. Figured if the Star Tribune had an obit on him, they'd have one on her. Good guess. BusterD (talk) 22:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • "A correspondent for SPORTS ILLUSTRATED since its early days in the mid-1950s" in the source, and "a correspondent for Sports Illustrated magazine from its earliest days in the mid-1950s". Wording and structure are close.
    • While I'm here, I'm getting only 3,498 characters with the DYK check tool; that would leave this a smidgen short. But the things above are more important, since that is what has caused the recent criticism of DYK as a whole. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 19:44, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]