Template talk:Double reed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New template[edit]

The new template format is good, but I don't like the idea of changing all the color schemes to the same light purple color, since the colors are often (as in this case) selected carefully to match with the subject, in this case the color of the reed. Badagnani 09:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could we get a variety of similar lighter/darker tones in the body of the template as well, the way the light purple ones do? Badagnani 09:28, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean the alternating light shading of the list cells that make it easier to tell which lines go with which group headers? Those can be modified with the evenstyle and oddstyle parameters. Bryan Derksen 10:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, just like with the other ones you're doing, but just with these kind of tan/golden brown colors. Badagnani 17:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're picking the colors, go right ahead. Just add "evenstyle=" and "oddstyle=" to the template in the same manner as the group and title style parameters. Bryan Derksen 21:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that seems very confusing. Badagnani 01:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if we could get a variety of similar lighter/darker tones in the body of the template as well, as requested on October 14, 2007, thanks. Badagnani 23:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if we could get a variety of similar lighter/darker tones in the body of the template as well, as requested on October 14, 2007, thanks. Badagnani 17:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if we could get a variety of similar lighter/darker tones in the body of the template as well, as requested on October 14, 2007, thanks. Badagnani (talk) 08:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if we could get a variety of similar lighter/darker tones in the body of the template as well, as requested on October 14, 2007, thanks. Badagnani (talk) 20:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]