This template is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Why is it necessary to reduce font sizes to these unreadable 80%? If it is done to reduce the height of the template, then there are other ways, as exemplified on Oberliga (football). Please review and possibly revise that change... Madcynic 11:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm with you. I'm all for using a standardized look across the German football competition templates, but the things should be easy to read. Going with fonts at 100% will match the rest of the page, as well as making it readable. There's room to spare so I can't see why not. Wiggy! 13:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While I do understand the purpose of using nowrap, I don't think that bullet points help the readability of the template. For readability reasons, I'd like to revert to using | instead of bulletpoints, and if necessary, discontinue the use of nowrap. Opinions? --Madcynic 19:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No objection here, though I'd prefer it if we didn't use arbitrary linebreaks instead. These make the template that little bit larger than it needs to be. Not sure if there's a {{nowrap}} template using the | divider, however. - Dudesleeper · Talk 21:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I like the readability you get from making the names hang together in one piece. But I also like the bars rather than the bullets. A dilemma ... Wiggy! 00:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nicely done, Dudesleeper. Simple. Wiggy! 03:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
