User:Iadmc/humour

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Silly tagging templates[edit]

See User:Jorge Stolfi/Templates that I sorely miss for more...

"This page is our property" template[edit]

 

 

"However" template[edit]

 

 

"Mass vandalism" template[edit]

 

 

"This means what exactly?" Template[edit]

This one was recently deleted. See: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 February 25#Template:Passive voice

An effort by me[edit]

An ironically apt template added to an article in 2008 and still there in 2010[edit]

Perma link

From Weasel word:

Generalizations and non sequitur statements

The vagueness of a statement may disguise the validity or the aim of that statement. Generalizing...

Some of my sillier postings[edit]

  • Hello? The Main Page is linked somewhere in this post. Can you find it and the other links? 10 points for each correct answer. 100 points max (including my sig). Bonus points for identifying redlinks --Jubileeclipman 17:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Both from Canadian Wikipedians NB

  • More from above debate:

Here's my design:

I made all the links font color=#002BB8 which is the colour used for bluelinks here on WP. They will stay that colour, therefore, even if they are clicked. There was also much redundancy: for example, things that were black anyway were given font color=black for no obvious reason. I culled those redundancies. All the other article links go wine when clicked anyway so I still don't see the need to hard-code the surrounding links as #002BB8 but it might be a reasonable compromise. Any better? The dark blue above, BTW, was still a little dark for me to see the difference easily between that and black but I could live with it as a subtle way of indicating where the links are --Jubileeclipman 00:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

This would be best ..its the opposite of black and would trick people to click them again  :)  !!..Moxy (talk) 00:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
ROFLMAO! Hadn't thought of that... we could make them all wine so they don't think they haven't been there. No wait... --Jubileeclipman 00:46, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

A silly Wikitable[edit]

(Added by me to my user page while logged out and removed by Brambleclawx seconds later.)

Why a hung parliament would be a good thing Why a hung parliament would be a bad thing
They'll all have to talk to each other: They'll all have to talk to each other:
...issues will be discussed thoroughly ...issues will be discussed ad infinitum...