User:MrX/1

Personal attacks

Personal attacks from the past year

Date	Aspersion	Reply to...
February 2, 2018	"I have no interest in participating in one of Arbcom's famed show trials at all, let alone one opened upon the testimony of an unrepentant recidivist BLP violator. If Arbcom wants to railroad me the hell off of this website, they're going to have to do it without my help."[1] (Repeated on February 7, 2018.[2])	Gerda Arendt[3]
January 31, 2018	"There's nothing at all "conservative" about linking idiot-terms like Pink fucking Floyd and Jethro fucking Tull; it's an insult to our readers' intelligence and 100% inappropriate, per astonishingly clear, (seemingly) idiot-resistant instructions at the MoS page. Given your history, however, of ignoring policy (and tag-teaming), I guess I shouldn't be surprised."[4]	EEng[5]
January 18, 2018	"You put lie upon lie into this article, so please don't pretend you have any interest in it being "good". That's demonstrable fucking fact, a testable claim, there in the article's history for all to see. Please do ignore me; I'd love to be able to fix this article in peace."[6] (Reinserted after I redacted it.[7])	Prhartcom[8]
January 18, 2018	"It was developed by collaboration among overtly biased editors who somehow managed to get it through a GA-review with no less than 3 outright lies in it, to say nothing of the myriad biases and exaggerations."[9]	MrX[10]
November 11, 2017	"Spare me your patronizing bullshit. It was far from the first lie that I've had to remove from this "good" article."[11] (Reinserted after I redacted it.[12])	Prhartcom[13]
March 28, 2017	"Well I hope you go fuck yourself."[14]	Philafrenzy[15]
	"[]"	[]
	"[]"	[]

Treating Wikipedia as a WP:BATTLEGROUND

Too many of Joefromrandb's interactions are brutish and hostile, and clear violations of Wikipedia's conduct policies. He frequently attacks, berates, derides, mocks, insults, ignores, and taunts editors during content disputes. These interactions, especially when combined with edit warring, appear to be designed to win by force and humiliation, rather than reason. Admins are hesitant to block such behavior, knowing that such blocks frequently boomerang back on the blocking admin[16] because of a vocal faction of Wikipedia editors who advocate for greater latitude when it comes to civility enforcement.

Refusal to assume good faith: [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]

Mocking sarcasm: [25][26][27][28][29]

Accusation of trolling: [30][31][32]

Accusations of lying (without evidence): [33][34][35][36][37]

Taunting: [38][39][40]

Hostility: [41][42][43][44][45]

Hostile edit summaries:[46][47][48][49] [50][51][52]

Edit warring

Joefromrandb has a history of unabated edit warring, undeterred by warnings and blocks.

Edit warring examples from the past year

Date(s)	Page	Diffs	Comments
January 13, 2018	Bernie Leadon	[53][54][55][56]	Reported to AN/EW. Self-reverted with an edit summary "A user I respect has disagreed with my edit (see how fucking easy that is?"
December 1, 2017	Australian rules football	[57][58][59][60]	Reported to AN/EW. Both editors warned.
October 6, 2017	Mum (disambiguation)	[61][62][63][64][65][66]	Reported to AN/EW
August 21, 2017	Kim Davis	[67][68][69][70]	Reported to AN/EW. Joefromrandb blocked.
August 3, 2017	Kim Davis	[71][72][73] [74]
July 28, 2017 to August 1, 2018	Kim Davis	[75][76][77][78]
July 17, 2017	Roger Waters	[79][80][81][82]	Reported to AN/EW. Page protected.
June 13, 2017	Efforts to impeach Barack Obama	[83][84][85]	Reported to AN/EW Admin MSGJ commented: "Neither user has breached 3RR particularly since one of those reverts was immediately self-reverted. However I agree with Drmies that Joefromrandb is on extremely thin ice, and it was spectacularly bad judgement to return to edit warring on that article straight after the previous block expired."
February 19, 2017	Robert Sungenis	[86][87][88][89][90]	Reported to AN/EW Joefromrandb blocked

User talk:Joefromrandb#August 2017