User:S k y r/Workzone/The Mink Case
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2022) |
 | This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. (October 2022) |
.jpg)
The Mink Case (Danish: Minksagen) is a series of incidents involving orders issued by Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen on 4 November 2020 for the slaughter of all mink in Denmark, during the coronavirus pandemic. On the previous day, a risk assessment had been conducted by the Statens Serum Institut (SSI), concluding that "continued mink breeding during an ongoing covid-19 epidemic poses a significant risk to public health". However, on 8 November, it was then announced that the orders had been issued without a legal basis (Danish: lovhjemmel) and that it had instead been a political decision to kill all mink, as that had not been the SSI's recommendation.
The government then put forward a bill which, with its adoption on 21 December 2020, established legal authority behind the decisions. In the intervening period, the slaughter had continued illegally with the help of the police and other authorities. Later, some of the mink that had been buried were exhumed and incinerated.
Mette Frederiksen stated on 24 August 2022 that she would like to "discuss whether it is a scandal". On 30 August of the same year, she described the case as "a political scandal".[citation needed]
The ban on mink breeding continued until the end of 2021, and was then extended until 2022. As of 2022, the mink case is estimated to cost the Danish state approximately DKr 20 billion (US$3 billion). All compensation to the mink breeders is expected to be paid by 2027.[citation needed]
Beginning[edit]
The mink case began on 15 June 2020, when the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration registered corona infection on mink herds in Vendsyssel, North Jutland. The authorities decided that the minks on these farms should be killed to prevent the corona mutation from spreading further. Later in September, SSI wrote in a risk assessment about "a special mink variant" which had spread in North Jutland. The variant was later named cluster 5 by SSI, whose concern was that a new corona variant could potentially reduce the effect of a future vaccine and that Denmark could become "a new Wuhan". On 1 October, the government announced at a press conference that all mink within a radius of 7.8 kilometres (4.8 miles) of an infected farm had to be killed. This meant that approximately 100 farms in North Jutland had to cut down their herds, even though only 41 farms were infected.
Later on October 13, it emerged that the mutated coronavirus that was found in Danish mink could reduce the effectiveness of corona vaccines. It happened in an interview with chief physician Anders Fomsgaard from SSI. Following this, SSI published a new risk assessment on 3 November 2020, which concluded that "continued mink breeding during an ongoing covid-19 epidemic poses a significant risk to public health, including the possibilities of preventing covid-19 with vaccines".
Health professional criticism of the decision[edit]
SSI's risk assessment, which was the main argument behind the decision, was subsequently criticized by other experts for being based on a thin professional basis. Jan Gerstoft, the chief physician and professor at the Rigshospitalet hospital, said, "The interpretation from the Statens Serum Institut simply does not hold up."[citation needed] Professor of immunology Jens Christian Jensenius said "The results of Anders Fomsgaard's preliminary experiments have been developed by Kåre Mølbak to misuse science and promote the dramatic decision November 4. This decision was not made on an evidence-based basis."[citation needed] Furthermore, the Danish Medicines Agency assessed on November 9 that the mutations did not pose a significant threat to the effectiveness of first-generation vaccines. Furthermore, on 2 November, two days before the press conference at which the slaughter was announced, SSI had outlined a model in which the breeding animals would have survived.
Before the completion of SSI's risk assessment, the University of Copenhagen was presented with the data base from SSI. They rejected a vaccine threat. So did the director of the Danish Health Authority, Søren Brostrøm, who explained, "I strongly warned against cluster 5 being the basis for a new risk assessment."[citation needed]
Five days after the press conference, Kåre Mølbak[who?] changed his assessment[clarification needed] and stated, "Our biggest concern since June has been the large reservoir for viruses that mink constitutes." Head of department in SSI, Tyra Grove Krause stated in this connection that the ongoing trial, highlighted by Minister of Health Magnus Heunicke at the press conference, did not document that the cluster 5 variant posed a threat to a future vaccine.
The decision to cull all mink[edit]
The same day[which?] in the evening there was a meeting of the government's coordination committee. Here, in 44 minutes, it was decided to cull all mink in Denmark, including the breeding animals. Mette Frederiksen and several other central ministers were present at the meeting. In the annexes handed out to the meeting participants six minutes before the start of the meeting, doubts were cast on the legality of the order. Mette Frederiksen has since refused to answer whether she read the warning. According to several meeting participants, the question of legal authority was not addressed. The meeting was held without minutes.[citation needed]
The following day, the Prime Minister's Office called a press conference. Mette Frederiksen gave the order, "Firstly, it is necessary to kill all mink in Denmark. Unfortunately, this also applies to the breeding animals". The order to kill all mink, in addition to the order on the so-called speed bonuses, was later declared illegal by the government itself, several legal experts and the Mink Commission, which described them as "grossly misleading and clearly illegal".
In the following hours and days, millions of Danish mink were euthanized. The farmers were offered a "speed bonus" if they killed their mink quickly. In the slaughter of the minks, the police, the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration, the Armed Forces and the Home Guard assisted, although there is no legal authority for this.
Lack of legal basis[edit]
Wednesday 4 November shortly before the government the same day at a press conference at 16 ordered all the country's mink culled, the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration tried to warn of legal problems. The agency contacted the Ministry of Food and Agriculture and asked for a contact in the Ministry of Justice, because the agency did not believe that there was a legal basis for killing all the country's mink. At the press conference, Mette Frederiksen ordered all the country's mink euthanized. This applied to infected, non-infected as well as breeding animals. Later that evening, the ministry indicated to the Ministry of Justice that the Danish Food and Food Administration's assessment was that there was no authority to kill all mink, which "the Ministry of the Environment and Food can agree with". The following day, the Ministry of Justice stated that the ministry "has no grounds for overriding" the assessment. It was agreed that new legislation should be made to obtain authorization to kill mink outside the zones. On the evening of November 5, Kopenhagen Fur approached the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration and requested clearer communication to the mink breeders, who felt "frustration and confusion".
At the request of Kopenhagen Fur and the Ministry of the Environment and Food, the agency sent a proposal for a letter to all mink breeders to the ministry's head of department. The letter concerned both mink in and outside the infection zones. The ministry recently sent some proposals for corrections back to the agency, and the agency corrected them in the letter. That same afternoon, the ministry sends the email to the agency stating that the agency is "forced to initiate the culling before the numbers are up. Both on infected and non-infected herds", and that it should "be clear from the letter to the mink breeders that they just have to start".
The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration sent the letter to the mink breeders via Kopenhagen Fur. The letter stated, "The government has announced that all mink in the country must be killed for reasons of public health. It is important that the killings take place as soon as possible". To the mink breeders outside the infection zones, it was stated, "The culling of all mink (including breeding animals) must be over by 16 November 2020. You must therefore start culling and furring the herd as soon as possible. You must pay particular attention that there is no mink , who escape and run into nature".
On 8 November, then Minister of Food Mogens Jensen informed the Danish Parliament and the press that the government had neither the legal authority for the ongoing culling of all mink nor speed bonuses. The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration then sent a new letter to the mink breeders that said it was not an order, but an "invitation" to kill outside the zones, and that the government was working to secure the necessary legal authority to require all mink to be culled.[3]
L 77[edit]
As a consequence of the lack of legal authority, on 16 November 2020 (published on 10 November), Food Minister Rasmus Prehn put forward a bill on the culling of all mink and a temporary ban on keeping mink. The bill (L 77) also contained authority for the payment of a bonus to the mink breeders who contributed to the killing of their animals. After a settlement between the government and its supporting parties (Radikale Venstre, Socialistisk Folkeparti, Enhedslisten) and the Alternative 16 December, the bill was adopted on 21 December 2020, which established a legal basis for the decisions. The bourgeois parties[clarification needed] voted against it. In a draft of the bill from the government, it appeared to assert that it had been the SSI's recommendation to cull all mink in Denmark. This was rejected by SSI, which emphasized that it was a political decision. In addition to the adoption of L 77, the Mink Commission was also raised as a consequence of the case. The government initially tried to get the bill expedited, which requires a three-quarters majority in the Danish Parliament. The government abandoned this.
After 8 November, disagreement arose among legal professionals as to how the orders actually lacked legal authority. In the Mink Commission's report, it was stated that the orders were "grossly misleading and clearly illegal".[citation needed]
Mogens Jensen's explanations[edit]
During his questioning at the Mink Commission,[when?] Mogens Jensen said he was only made aware of the missing permit on Saturday 7 November at 18:31. The Mink Commission later wrote that "The Commission has assumed that Mogens Jensen received information earlier, namely on 5 November 2020. The Commission thus finds that Mogens Jensen, at least during the consultation on 11 November 2020, provided incorrect information."[citation needed]
After it was revealed that he had spoken untruthfully to Parliament, Minister of Food Mogens Jensen found that there was not a majority behind his continued work as minister, and he submitted his resignation on 18 November 2020.
Mink Commission[edit]
On 23 April 2021, the Danish parliament (Danish: Folketing) set up a Mink Commission (Danish: Minkkommissionen) whose task was to "investigate and report on the overall course of events and on the actions and involvement of all relevant authorities and ministers in the decision and the implementation of the decision that all mink in Denmark as part of the effort to fight against covid-19 should immediately be culled". However, the Mink Commission was not allowed to make a legal assessment of the responsibility of ministers.
During the preparation of the commission's report, it emerged on 1 November 2021 that Mette Frederiksen and advisers in the State Ministry had deleted text messages exchanged during the mink process, and that these had not been handed over to the Mink Commission, even though the latter had already requested it on 29 April 2021. At a press conference on 3 November 2021, Mette Frederiksen stated that an automatic deletion function on her phone had been switched on since the summer of 2020 at the latest. This after advice from Barbara Bertelsen, which she confirmed when she was questioned on 18 November 2021. To a question about a harsh tone in some of the published text messages between ministries and agencies, Mette Frederiksen answered, among other things, "So yes, there may have been a finch off the forehead and more than that. Live with it – live with it".[citation needed][clarification needed]
The police subsequently attempted to recover the text messages and announced to the public on 12 November that they had finished trying to recover them, but without success. On the same day, the government received the results of the police test in sealed envelopes. On Monday 15 November at 09:00, a meeting was held between the Mink Commission, the Ministry of Justice, Mette Frederiksen and the three top officials in the Prime Minister's Office, who had switched on the automatic deletion of text messages after 30 days. On Wednesday 17 November, Mette Frederiksen published the result of the police investigation, which was that it had not been possible to recreate the deleted text messages. The prime minister was criticized for delaying the announcement of the result until Wednesday, the day after the 2021 municipal and regional council elections, when she had the opportunity to announce it immediately after the meeting on Monday. This i.a. by Jakob Ellemann (V), who called it "convenient". When asked why she waited to announce the result until Wednesday, the prime minister replied, "It's because I've been preoccupied with some other things, it almost goes without saying."[citation needed] During the period, Mette Frederiksen had, among other things, been in Hjørring and Aarhus to run an election campaign.
The Mink Commission had no influence on when the envelopes were opened and there was no legal problem with having published the result earlier.[citation needed]
Mink Commission's conclusions[edit]
The commission submitted its report on 30 June 2022, in which it appeared that the decision to kill all Danish mink was without legal authority. The commission concluded:
"The Commission thus finds that Mette Frederiksen's announcements at the press conference on 4 November 2020 were objectively grossly misleading, but that Mette Frederiksen subjectively did not have knowledge of this or the intention to do so. The Commission has therefore not made an assessment of whether there is gross negligence".
The commission also concluded that Mette Frederiksen "must have been aware" that the KU meeting was "organized and material prepared in a forced process." Mette Frederiksen's announcements at the press conference on November 4, where she ordered all mink euthanized, were "grossly misleading and clearly illegal".
The report said the Prime Minister's Office as a whole had acted "very criticisably" and the Food Ministry "particularly criticisably", and that Mogens Jensen had spoken untruthfully to the Folketing. The commission also concluded that that 10 civil servants had committed "official misconduct of such severity that there was a basis for the public authorities to seek to hold them accountable".
List of officials[edit]
| List of the 10 officials who committed misconduct[4] | Penalty | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Position | Ministry/Agency | |
| Barbara Bertelsen | Head of Department | Prime Minister's Office | Warning |
| Henrik Studsgaard | Head of Department | Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries | Tjenestefritagelse[clarification needed] |
| Johan Legarth | Head of Department | Ministry of Justice | Irettesættelse[clarification needed] |
| Anne-Mette Lyhne Jensen | Division manager | Ministry of Justice | Warning |
| Tejs Binderup | Division manager | Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries | Non |
| Paolo Drostby | Office manager | Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries | Non |
| Thorkild Fogde | National Police Chief | Danish National Police | Tjenestefritagelse |
| Uffe Stormly | Police inspector | Danish National Police | Warning |
| Birgitte Buch | Legal section manager | Danish National Police | Warning |
| Hanne Larsen | Veterinary Director | The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration | Non |
Legal assessments outside the Mink Commission[edit]
_(cropped).jpg)
Knowledge and assumption of responsibility[edit]
A central question in the Mink case has been whether the government and Mette Frederiksen in particular knew they were breaking the law when they ordered all mink killed, and whether ministers can be held legally responsible. Throughout the process, the government has maintained that this was not done. The Mink Commission was not allowed to assess this.
In the meeting material for the government's K-committee meeting, where the decision was made, two models were proposed:
- To put the mink industry to sleep. This would mean slaughtering most mink, but allowing the breeding animals to survive, so that the mink industry could be revived after the coronavirus pandemic.
- To close down the profession. That would mean slaughtering all mink and banning mink farming.
It appeared from the appendices that there was most likely no legal authority for any of them. The government said it chose a third model which consisted of a "culling" of all mink, but not a permanent ban on mink breeding. This model was also illegal without new legislation. In its defence, the government has distinguished between the legal difference between killing all mink and shutting down the mink industry. In December 2020, Mette Frederiksen stated i.a. "There is politics, and then there is law. The government has not made a decision to close the mink industry. The government has made a decision that the minks must be killed. These are two different decisions."[citation needed] This distinction has been questioned by several legal experts. Most notably law professor Kristian Lauta and professor of administrative and constitutional law Frederik Waage. The latter commented, "It has the same effect. You could perhaps theoretically imagine that immediately after the minks were killed, you were allowed to pick up some new minks in another country and start breeding them. It's just a very theoretical scenario."[citation needed]
Furthermore, it met with criticism that Barbara Bertelsen had removed the sentence "A total slaughter, including all breeding animals, is assessed to be fatal for the industry" from the meeting documents for the meeting of the government's coordination committee on 3 November.[citation needed]
Mette Frederiksen apologized for the process, but has maintained throughout the case that it was well-founded in terms of health to slaughter all mink.
On 22 September, the law firm Lund Elmer Sandager submitted an assessment specifically on the possible legal liability of the ministers involved, which the Mink Commission was not allowed to do. In the assessment, the law firm concluded that Mogens Jensen and Mette Frederiksen could be found guilty by impeachment, but acquitted other involved ministers. The assessment showed, among other things, "It is our assessment that Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen [...] has acted grossly negligently and may incur criminal liability."[citation needed] The assessment was funded by funds raised by the political party Nye Borgerlige, but the law firm as well as the party said that it was completely impartial. Lasse Lund Madsen, Ph.D. and professor at the Department of Law at Aarhus University had brought a similar criticism the month before.
Relationship with the Constitution[edit]
In section 73 of the Danish Constitution (Danish: Grundloven), subsection 1 states: "The right to property is inviolable. No one can be forced to give up their property, except where the public good requires it. This can only be done according to law and against full compensation". In their criticism, legal experts have assessed that there is a "tightened legal requirement" when the government issues an order with such major consequences for property rights.
Journalizing duty[edit]
Another point of criticism that the Mink Commission did not take a position on, was the breach of the so-called journalizing duty (Danish: journaliseringspligten) in connection with the destruction of possible evidence in the form of the deleted text messages.
The Police's role[edit]
.jpg)
At the press conference on November 4, 2020, Mette Frederiksen stated that in order to support the food authorities' ongoing euthanasia efforts, "an emergency plan for euthanasia is now being implemented, which is handled under the auspices of The National Operative Staff (Danish: Den Nationale Operative Stab) under the command of the police".
After the press conference, mink breeders outside the infection zones were called by employees of the National Police (Danish: Rigspolitiet). To support the conversations with the growers, the cadets were given a so-called action card, which functioned as a script. The text called on the breeders to participate in the culling of their herds, and one of the questions was whether they were willing to do so. If they answered yes to this, the conversation was over. If they answered no, the police officers were instructed to say, "I'm sorry to hear that, but the decision has been made. Failure to cooperate will therefore mean that you will not be able to obtain the bonus, and you can expect the authorities to come and de-crew anyway. I therefore want to know if this makes you change your mind?"
Criticism of the National Police[edit]
The National Police, and in particular the National Police Chief, Thorkild Fogde, was criticized for carrying out this, was raised after the publication of the Ministry of the Environment and Food's report from 18 November 2020, which concluded that the National Police at the time of drawing up the action card showed that it was illegal . This was also recognized by the National Police itself afterwards. "It was, however, the National Police's clear understanding that the necessary authority would be available within a short time", according to a written reply from the National Police to the Ministry of Justice. The knowledge of the National Police met with criticism from both legal and political sides. Among other things. stated Alex Vanopglagh (LA), "A chief of the National Police, who must ensure that the country's laws are respected and punish those who don't, he puts in a system that you don't respect the country's laws. It's absolutely crazy".
The lawyer's inquiry into the police's action card[edit]
In the spring of 2021, the Danish Parliament launched a legal investigation into the police's action card in the mink case. The lawyer's investigation's report was published on 8 October 2021 and was prepared by lawyer Claus Guldager. The investigation concludes that there was negligence in connection with the action card and that a more detailed assessment of this could not be carried out within the framework established for the investigation. Furthermore, the investigation concluded, "There is no basis for assuming that people in the top management of the police – or in the management layer below – have instructed anyone to prepare an action card".
In the investigation's account of the actual course of events, there is a comment on the question of whether it was fair, as the Ministry of the Environment and Food wrote in its report of 18 November 2020, "It has not been established in the available material that the question of authorization to expanding the previous effort to kill mink to the whole country has been mentioned in cases for discussion in the relevant government committees in the period after 1 October 2020 and until 3 November 2020." In this connection, the investigation pointed out that in the cover (main memo) to the government's coordination committee meeting on 3 November 2020 on the emergency plan for culling, it was stated, "The emergency plan is estimated to require deviations from a number of applicable rules and guidelines in the environmental and animal areas".
On the basis of the investigation, on 19 November 2021, the Danish Parliament expanded the Mink Commission's terms of reference to also include an investigation of the police's action card.
Burial of culled mink[edit]
From 5 to 9 November, approximately 13.5 million mink were killed in Denmark. Approximately 3 million of those were buried in mass graves. According to the Ministry of Food, the burial of the mink was deemed necessary due to the "tempo of the culling". As the animals decayed, gases were formed which caused them to expand and push them out of the ground all the while risking contaminating drinking water.
On 2 December, Food Minister Rasmus Prehn and Environment Minister Lea Wermelin were called to consult on the matter. On 21 December 2020, it was decided that the minks should be excavated. In May 2021 and two months ahead, the exhumation of nearly four million dead mink began at military facilities near Holstebro and Karup. The exhumation was estimated in advance to cost DKr 80 million (US$13 million). However, the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries requested DKr 150 million (US$24 million) to be made available. The excavated mink were taken to 13 different incineration plants around Denmark.
According to Peter Pagh, professor of environmental law at the University of Copenhagen, there was a lack of legal authority to deposit the dead mink in the mass graves. However, in its memorandum of 15 December 2020, the Ministry of Food denied having broken the law. The course received criticism from both ends in the Folketinget by, among others, Rasmus Jarlov (K), who called the burial of mink a "tragic story taken on a thin and hasty basis".
The lawyer's inquiry into the burial of culled mink[edit]
In the spring of 2021, the Danish Parliament launched a lawyer's investigation into the burial of culled mink. The report of the investigation was published on 8 October 2021. In the investigation, it is concluded about mistakes and negligence, "that it will not be possible on the present basis to attribute the mistakes made to individual persons, or that any mistakes by the individual person will have the character of a misconduct".
Compensation for the mink breeders[edit]
When the government's decision was announced, no compensation agreement was ready. Only on 25 January 2021 was an agreement on compensation for the mink breeders adopted in the Folketing. The agreement included a framework of DKr 1.8–2.8 billion (US$286–445 million) in direct compensation for the mink that were euthanized in 2020 without being furred. In addition, DKr 8.9 billion (US$1.41 billion) was given in compensation for loss of future income base and compensation for the residual value of the production apparatus, which no longer had value for the mink breeder. A number of businesses directly dependent on mink breeding – including feed centres, furries, auction houses and transport companies – were awarded compensation for the loss of the part of their business that concerned the Danish mink industry. It was estimated in the agreement to entail costs of DKr 3–4 billion (US$477–636 million).
The compensation for the individual mink companies was also to depend on assessments made by "a special compensation and assessment commission for handling the mink compensations". In June, assessments had not yet begun. The case processing time was criticized by, among others, chairman of Danske Minkavlere, Tage Pedersen, who stated, "I think it is deeply unreasonable. I knew it would take a long time to expropriate an entire industry, but it is taking far too long. That we look into, that it takes another four to five years, it is completely unreasonable for the 1000 families who are affected".
It was not until 18 December 2021 that the Ministry of Food announced, after the establishment of six compensation and assessment commissions, that the assessment of the mink companies would begin.
On 23 September 2022, based on SSI's assessment, the government decided to lift the ban on mink breeding from 1 January 2023. However, only 14 farms, corresponding to approximately 1% of the profession, to restart. The rest applied for shutdown compensation. Mink breeders who chose to restart had to continue to comply with infection prevention measures. Including testing of mink, use of protective equipment and hygiene course.
Price[edit]
According to the Ministry of Food, payments to the mink breeders as of 2 September 2022 cost the Danish state DKr 6.6 billion (US$1.05 billion). However, the total cost of payments is expected to be around 20 billion. Only after these are over will the valuation of the nearly 1,100 mink farms in Denmark, in addition to other mink-related companies that are entitled to compensation, begin. Officially, the Danish Food and Food Administration expects that the valuation commissions will be completed in 2024,[143] but the Minister of Food did not not guarantee that all compensation will be paid before 2027.
According to Statistics Denmark, the actual production value of the Danish mink industry was 2.5 billion in 2019.
Political criticism of the government[edit]
.jpg)
_(cropped).jpg)
.jpg)
_(cropped).jpg)
Mette Frederiksen as head of government has been particularly criticized for showing absolute power during the process. In September 2022, Mette Frederiksen stated that, in her opinion, the criticism of her as being powerful can partly be attributed to the fact that she is a woman.
The most important of the points of criticism is that the government ordered all mink in Denmark killed without legal authority and that the government, with its subsequent action, brought the mink breeders into an uncertain legal situation. Based on this and the Ministry of the Environment and Food's report of 18 November 2020,[99] which stated that there was no legal authority to order mink killed outside the infection zones, the Prime Minister has apologized for the process, but maintained that it was well-founded in terms of health kill all mink.
The Liberal Alliance has referred to the case as "the biggest political scandal in Danish history".[citation needed]
The government was criticized for not having sufficient professional background to make the decision, and it has been advocated that professionals other than SSI should have had access to data and trial descriptions, a so-called second opinion.
Sanctions[edit]
|
After speaking untruthfully to the Folketing, Food Minister Mogens Jensen found that there was not a majority behind his continued work as minister, and he submitted his resignation on 18 November 2020.
In the Mink Commission's report of 30 June 2022, criticism was directed at Mette Frederiksen and Mogens Jensen. On 5 July they were awarded a noose by the Danish Parliament for their role in the case. Furthermore, it appeared from the report that 10 civil servants had committed "misconduct of such gravity that there are grounds for the public authorities to seek to hold them accountable". At the Prime Minister's press conference on the Mink Commission's report on 1 July 2022, Mette Frederiksen reported that the commission's assessments of civil servants would be reviewed primarily by the Swedish Personnel and Competence Agency.[160] Based on the agency's review, Barbara Bertelsen, head of department in the Prime Minister's Office, was given a warning on 24 August, but continued in her position. At the same time, Johan Legarth, head of department in the Ministry of Justice, was given a reprimand, while national police chief Thorkild Fogde and head of department in the Ministry of the Environment, Henrik Studsgaard, were relieved of duty and summoned to official hearings.
The independence of the Swedish Personnel and Competence Agency was disputed by Jørgen Grønnegård Christensen, professor emeritus of political science at Aarhus University, who called the prime minister's statement that the agency was politically independent "somewhat ridiculous". Criticism of the commission's independence was backed up by Eva Smith, professor at the University of Copenhagen's law faculty and honorary doctorate at Lund University, who pointed out that the agency was made up of civil servants "who rank lower in the hierarchy than the people whose responsibility they have to assess".
On 20 September, the National Police announced that officials Uffe Stormly and Birgitte Buch had received a warning. According to the Mink Commission, they had contributed to "breach of the duty of truth and the principle of legality in connection with the police's use of action cards on 6 November 2020". On 22 September, the Ministry of Food announced that officials Tejs Binderup, Paolo Drostby and Hanne Larsen had also received a warning. On the same day, Anne-Mette Lyhne Jensen was also given a warning in the Ministry of Justice. These decisions were also made on the basis of a review by the Danish Personnel and Skills Agency (Danish: Medarbejder- og Kompetencestyrelsen).
As a political consequence of the Mink Commission's report, the social liberal party announced that if Mette Frederiksen did not call an election by the opening of the Folketing on 4 October 2022 at the latest, the party would overthrow the government by a vote of no confidence.
External links[edit]
References[edit]
- ^ Coronavirus i Hjørring har mutationer, der ikke ses andre steder i Danmark eller Europa TV 2 Nord.
- ^ "Fakta om minkbranchen i Danmark".
- ^ "Redegørelse for forløbet vedrørende manglende hjemmel til at udvide den hidtidige indsats med aflivning af mink til hele landet" (PDF). Folketinget. Miljø- og Fødevareministeriet. 18 November 2020. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Lønstrup, Katrine Falk; Jensen, Laura Bejder (24 August 2022). "Her er Minkkommissionens kritik af ti embedsmænd". Altinget. Archived from the original on 28 August 2022. Retrieved 28 August 2022.
- ^ Pedersen, Mette Stender (19 November 2020). "Mette Frederiksen: Jeg havde gjort det samme, hvis jeg vidste, det var ulovligt". TV 2 Nord. Retrieved 2 October 2022.