User talk:河蟹~enwiki
Single Payer[edit]
I don't know if you are the same person as this user but it seems possible, in which case you would be violating WP:SOCK. Just a warning in case that's what is going on, and if you admit to it now you can avoid any problems in terms of a block in the future.
Regardless, please discuss this change on the article talk page. It does break convention as you admit, you have no consensus for it, it isn't necessary, and it's actually inaccurate since "insurance" need not (and generally does not) have anything to do with single-payer systems. I've already reverted more than I would prefer and am going to let it sit for now, but unless you get consensus from other editors we are not going to change away from Wikipedia convention for lead paragraphs simply because you think we should. Please head to Talk:Single-payer health care to discuss this. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 20:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have replied to your talk page post, but please, do not assume bad faith and accuse me of breaking policy when you are frustrated with the community's emerging consensus against your preferred lead wording. 河蟹 (talk) 21:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- I did not assume bad faith, I wondered if you were the same person editing as an IP address, which you have not answered. I'm willing to think that could be an honest mistake on your part, or that it's a coincidence that an IP made a change, I reverted it, and a brand new account showed up out of nowhere to revert it. That can happen, but I was expressing a concern that there is some logged in/logged out editing going on. Again you did not address the issue squarely.
- And please don't remark on "the community's emerging consensus." The existing consensus is for the version I reverted to, and two edits (by you and the IP editor) do not change anything. You're supposed to get consensus before you make the change - not present a fait accompli after the fact. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 21:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- And of course you ignored my second point about consensus, both here and on the article talk page. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 00:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Bad username?[edit]
Your username clearly states your opinions on politics. You ought to change that. Kayau Voting IS evil 03:09, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed[edit]
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called 河蟹. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name 河蟹~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
03:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed[edit]
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
21:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)