User talk:137.25.35.93

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm RA0808. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dodge Charger (LX/LD) seemed less than neutral to me because it added unsourced opinion, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 18:30, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Kia Quoris. --Sable232 (talk) 18:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is because you haven't checked any references I put. I am going to report you to the police. 137.25.35.93 (talk) 18:03, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Look. I don't know the cars, and don't care what size they are. I was unfortunate enough to stumble across your blanking of references and reverted them accordingly like I would any other disruptive edits. Now that you've resorted to personal attacks and disrupting other articles to make a point, it's clear that you're not here to make any constructive contributions. --Sable232 (talk) 18:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Kia Cadenza. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I assume that this edit summary is a reference to Sable232? Insults directed towards other editors are absolutely forbidden, and could result in your IP address being blocked. GirthSummit (blether) 18:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC) GirthSummit (blether) 18:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I AM DEFENDING MYSELF FROM YOUR IDIOCY. My parents told me when I was little, if someone hits me, I hit them harder. #SelfDefense this was NO attack. The Cadenza, Avalon, Maxima are midsize, but y'all are in denial.. Those cars are no bigger than a Fusion or a Malibu. They're just LWB versions of the Optima, Camry, Altima 137.25.35.93 (talk) 18:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC) a Cadenza may be fullsize but the K900 ABSOLUTELY is fullsize[reply]

Claiming that calling someone an idiot is 'self defense' in non-sensical. You are not being attacked, no one is hitting you - you are engaged in a disagreement about how to describe the size of a car. You must discuss content disputes in a civil manner, abiding by our policies, or your IP address will be blocked. GirthSummit (blether) 18:21, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. I've just looked at the rest of your contributions - that was not the first time you have directed insults towards another editor. Do not do it again. GirthSummit (blether) 18:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM. Second of all, FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Third of all, SELF DEFENSE.

Also how is a Hyundai Azera midsize and a Kia Cadenza fullsize if they are sized similarly and are relatives? A LARGER G80 GENESIS is considered midsize by people on Wiki, and an EVEN LARGER KIA K900, which is as big as an Impala/Taurus/standard wheelbase Bmw 7 series, is considered midsize. A Toyota Avalon and a Nissan Maxima are fullsize yet they are smaller than a midsize BMW 5 Series and Mercedes E Class LOLOLOLOLOL Wiki is starting to allow in more NPC botmods. Heck, a freaking Honda Accord and Ford Fusion are just as large in size as an Avalon 137.25.35.93 (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NO. 'Idiot' is not constructive criticism, it is an insult. Wikipedia does not have unfettered freedom of speech - you're not in a 'public forum', you're editing on a privately-owned website, which has policies that you must abide by if you do not want your IP address to be blocked. I already commented on your 'self defense' argument. I've said what I have to say - if you insult anyone again on a talk page or in an edit summary, I will report you to administrators for personal attacks.
As for the size of these cars, I personally have no view on how we should describe them. Discuss the question with other editors who have an interest in the field - but do it civilly, without insulting people who disagree with you. GirthSummit (blether) 18:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, 137.25.35.93, I couldn't care less what size they are. If you would have bothered to find reliable sources the first time rather than deleting the ones that were there and then getting triggered because your deletion was reverted, this wouldn't be a problem. --Sable232 (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please let me offer you a piece of (genuinely friendly) advice. I've looked through your contribution history, and I can see that you are trying to add useful content, and that you are quite new to editing Wikipedia, so perhaps you haven't quite learned how things work around here yet.
  • Assertions need to be sourced. Even if you think something is wrong, you can't delete or change it unless you have a reliable source to support the change. You are likely to get reverted if you replace a sourced assertion with an unsourced one, even if you are right.
  • Sources should be cited in the text that you add, not mentioned in the edit summary.
  • WP:RS gives guidelines for identifying reliable sources. Note that the sources considered best are independently published - so, for example, we would prefer an independent review of a car, than something from the manufacturer's website.
  • If your edit is reverted, do not just revert it back again - discuss the change on the talk page. Read the article on the bold-revert-discuss cycle for more on this.
I hope you are prepared to modify your behaviour, and discuss changes constructively with other editors - if you can do that, I believe that you will be a valuable contributor to the project. GirthSummit (blether) 18:43, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 18:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your block[edit]

As you have now discovered, Wikipedia takes personal attacks on other editors seriously. You can still read policies during your block, so I urge you to take time to read up on the links I gave you. There's also a really useful guide here that outlines how to go about editing here - lots of useful links. I hope that, if you decide to return to editing, you are prepared to interact constructively with other editors. GirthSummit (blether) 19:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC) I love ya, nigger! #darntootin 137.25.35.93 (talk) 20:20, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Paige Spiranac, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dorsetonian (talk) 10:15, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion involving you at WP:ANI John from Idegon (talk) 11:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2018[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism, as done at Mercedes-Benz.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:24, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2019[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Buick Regal, you may be blocked from editing. --Sable232 (talk) 16:15, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Teen Vogue. --David Tornheim (talk) 20:10, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Washuotaku. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nancy Goodman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.

September 2019[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did here, at TERF. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 08:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Louis Farrakhan, you may be blocked from editing. Philip Cross (talk) 10:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2020[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hillcrest High School (Dallas). Bmf 051 (talk) 23:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]